IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p985-d1026069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers and Determinants to the Underutilized Hypertension Screening in Primary Care Patients in Hong Kong: A Mixed-Method Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Yui-Ki Chu

    (The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Dong Dong

    (The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
    Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518000, China)

  • Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong

    (The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Eric Kam-Pui Lee

    (The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

Abstract

(1) Background: Hypertension (HT) is the most common chronic condition, affecting approximately 1.13 billion people worldwide. Despite freely available blood pressure (BP) devices in primary care (PC) clinics, many patients do not regularly screen for HT and are untreated. (2) Methods: This study investigated the proportion of PC patients who did not screen for HT and the underlying reasons in Hong Kong. An explanatory mixed-method cross-sectional study was conducted in 2020, which included a questionnaire survey, office BP measurements, and subsequent semi-structured interviews. Adult patients who had no diagnosis of HT were recruited in a large PC clinic by convenience sampling. The relationships between not having HT screening and sociodemographic data were investigated by logistic regression. Twenty-four patients were purposefully sampled (based on demographics) and were interviewed until data saturation. (3) Results: Among 428 participants, 190 (44.4%) had not had HT screening in the last two years, but 197 (46.0%) had HT. No HT screening in the last two years or ever was associated with being male, being single, being of younger age, having no family history of HT, having no clinic visits in the last two years, employment status, and self-perceived HT condition. Most participants (77.8%) misinterpreted their BP readings. Individual, social, and healthcare service barriers were identified in patients’ interviews. Many PC patients had no regular HT screening but around half had elevated BP. (4) Conclusion: The study results indicate that the barriers to HT screening were multifactorial. HT screening in PC is urgently needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Yui-Ki Chu & Dong Dong & Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong & Eric Kam-Pui Lee, 2023. "Barriers and Determinants to the Underutilized Hypertension Screening in Primary Care Patients in Hong Kong: A Mixed-Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:985-:d:1026069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/985/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/985/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haerawati Idris & Wahyu Pudji Nugraheni & Tety Rachmawati & Asep Kusnali & Anni Yulianti & Yuni Purwatiningsih & Syarifah Nuraini & Novia Susianti & Debri Rizki Faisal & Hidayat Arifin & Asri Maharani, 2024. "How Is Telehealth Currently Being Utilized to Help in Hypertension Management within Primary Healthcare Settings? A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:985-:d:1026069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.