IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1204-d1030464.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quick on Your Feet: Modifying the Star Excursion Balance Test with a Cognitive Motor Response Time Task

Author

Listed:
  • Russell K. Lowell

    (Resistance Exercise Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Nathan O. Conner

    (Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Hunter Derby

    (Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Christopher M. Hill

    (Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA)

  • Zachary M. Gillen

    (Resistance Exercise Performance Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Reuben Burch

    (Department of Industrial Systems and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
    Human Factors and Athlete Engineering, Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS), Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA)

  • Adam C. Knight

    (Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Jennifer C. Reneker

    (Department of Population Health Sciences, John D. Bower School of Population Health, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA)

  • Harish Chander

    (Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA
    Human Factors and Athlete Engineering, Center for Advanced Vehicular Systems (CAVS), Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39759, USA)

Abstract

The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) is a common assessment used across clinical and research settings to test dynamic standing balance. The primary measure of this test is maximal reaching distance performed by the non-stance limb. Response time (RT) is a critical cognitive component of dynamic balance control and the faster the RT, the better the postural control and recovery from a postural perturbation. However, the measure of RT has not been done in conjunction with SEBT, especially with musculoskeletal fatigue. The purpose of this study is to examine RT during a SEBT, creating a modified SEBT (mSEBT), with a secondary goal to examine the effects of muscular fatigue on RT during SEBT. Sixteen healthy young male and female adults [age: 20 ± 1 years; height: 169.48 ± 8.2 cm; weight: 67.93 ± 12.7 kg] performed the mSEBT in five directions for three trials, after which the same was repeated with a response time task using Blazepod™ with a random stimulus. Participants then performed a low-intensity musculoskeletal fatigue task and completed the above measures again. A 2 × 2 × 3 repeated measures ANOVA was performed to test for differences in mean response time across trials, fatigue states, and leg reach as within-subjects factors. All statistical analyses were conducted in JASP at an alpha level of 0.05. RT was significantly faster over the course of testing regardless of reach leg or fatigue state ( p = 0.023). Trial 3 demonstrated significantly lower RT compared to Trial 1 ( p = 0.021). No significant differences were found between fatigue states or leg reach. These results indicate that response times during the mSEBT with RT is a learned skill that can improve over time. Future research should include an extended familiarization period to remove learning effects and a greater fatigue state to test for differences in RT during the mSEBT.

Suggested Citation

  • Russell K. Lowell & Nathan O. Conner & Hunter Derby & Christopher M. Hill & Zachary M. Gillen & Reuben Burch & Adam C. Knight & Jennifer C. Reneker & Harish Chander, 2023. "Quick on Your Feet: Modifying the Star Excursion Balance Test with a Cognitive Motor Response Time Task," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1204-:d:1030464
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1204/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1204/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1204-:d:1030464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.