IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i24p7145-d1294506.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Community-Engaged Approach to Understanding Suicide in a Small Rural County in Georgia: A Two-Phase Content Analysis of Individual and Focus Group Interviews

Author

Listed:
  • Kimberly Beth Roth

    (Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Mercer University, 1250 E 66th Street, Savannah, GA 31404, USA)

  • Eleni Gaveras

    (Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA)

  • Fatima Ghiathi

    (Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Mercer University, 1250 E 66th Street, Savannah, GA 31404, USA)

  • Eric Kendall Shaw

    (Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Mercer University, 1250 E 66th Street, Savannah, GA 31404, USA)

  • Melanie Shanlin Shoemaker

    (Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Mercer University, 1250 E 66th Street, Savannah, GA 31404, USA)

  • Nicholas Adam Howard

    (Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Mercer University, 1250 E 66th Street, Savannah, GA 31404, USA)

  • Meena Dhir

    (Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Mercer University, 1250 E 66th Street, Savannah, GA 31404, USA)

  • Genesis Rebeca Caiza

    (Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Mercer University, 1250 E 66th Street, Savannah, GA 31404, USA)

  • Hannah Selene Szlyk

    (Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA)

Abstract

Suicide is a significant public health problem, with disproportionate rates in rural areas. Rural communities face substantial structural and cultural barriers to suicide prevention. This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of the need for suicide prevention and gauge the appropriateness of prevention efforts in the context of a rural Georgia county by leveraging existing community resources and knowledge. Twenty one-on-one, semi-structured interviews and two focus groups were conducted, with participants recruited via purposive snowball sampling. Data analysis included qualitative deductive and inductive content analysis from individual interviews and focus groups with community stakeholders. The findings highlight how rural contexts exacerbate drivers of death by suicide and how the substantial loss of community members to suicide contributes to the ongoing crisis and reduces available support. Access to mental health care often depended on a connection to an established public system such as schools, a military base, or Veterans Administration. There were perceived gaps in crisis and post-crisis services, with participants actively trying to address these gaps and build community support through coalition building. This study contributes knowledge to contextual drivers of suicide in rural areas beyond individual-level risk factors. Community-engaged suicide prevention research in rural areas is promising, but there is a need to develop interventions to best support coalition building and capacity development.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimberly Beth Roth & Eleni Gaveras & Fatima Ghiathi & Eric Kendall Shaw & Melanie Shanlin Shoemaker & Nicholas Adam Howard & Meena Dhir & Genesis Rebeca Caiza & Hannah Selene Szlyk, 2023. "A Community-Engaged Approach to Understanding Suicide in a Small Rural County in Georgia: A Two-Phase Content Analysis of Individual and Focus Group Interviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:24:p:7145-:d:1294506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/24/7145/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/24/7145/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Grattidge & Ha Hoang & Jonathan Mond & David Lees & Denis Visentin & Stuart Auckland, 2023. "Exploring Community-Based Suicide Prevention in the Context of Rural Australia: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:24:p:7145-:d:1294506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.