IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i23p7089-d1284209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic Performance of the Measurement of Skinfold Thickness for Abdominal and Overall Obesity in the Peruvian Population: A 5-Year Cohort Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian Rios-Escalante

    (Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15067, Peru
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Silvia Albán-Fernández

    (Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima 15067, Peru
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Rubén Espinoza-Rojas

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Biomédicas (INICIB), Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima 15039, Peru)

  • Lorena Saavedra-Garcia

    (Carrera de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15024, Peru)

  • Noël C. Barengo

    (Department of Medical Education, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA
    Escuela Superior de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina)

  • Jamee Guerra Valencia

    (Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima 15314, Peru)

Abstract

The escalating prevalence of overall and abdominal obesity, particularly affecting Latin America, underscores the urgent need for accessible and cost-effective predictive methods to address the growing disease burden. This study assessed skinfold thicknesses’ predictive capacity for overall and abdominal obesity in Peruvian adults aged 30 or older over 5 years. Data from the PERU MIGRANT 5-year cohort study were analyzed, defining obesity using BMI and waist circumference. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Adults aged ≥ 30 ( n = 988) completed the study at baseline, with 47% male. A total of 682 participants were included for overall and abdominal obesity analysis. The 5-year prevalence values for overall and abdominal obesity were 26.7% and 26.6%, respectively. Subscapular skinfold (SS) best predicted overall obesity in men (AUC = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.75–0.88) and women (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67–0.88). Regarding abdominal obesity, SS exhibited the highest AUC in men (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77–0.89), while SS and the sum of trunk skinfolds showed the highest AUC in women. In secondary analysis excluding participants with type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) at baseline, SS significantly predicted DM2 development in men (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58–0.83) and bicipital skinfold (BS) did in women (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62–0.84). The findings highlight SS significance as an indicator of overall and abdominal obesity in both sexes among Peruvian adults. Additionally, SS, and BS offer robust predictive indicators for DM2.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian Rios-Escalante & Silvia Albán-Fernández & Rubén Espinoza-Rojas & Lorena Saavedra-Garcia & Noël C. Barengo & Jamee Guerra Valencia, 2023. "Diagnostic Performance of the Measurement of Skinfold Thickness for Abdominal and Overall Obesity in the Peruvian Population: A 5-Year Cohort Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:23:p:7089-:d:1284209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/23/7089/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/23/7089/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Machoene D. Sekgala & Ronel Sewpaul & Maretha Opperman & Zandile J. Mchiza, 2022. "Comparison of the Ability of Anthropometric Indices to Predict the Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in South African Males: SANHANES-1," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Akram Hernández-Vásquez & Kamyla M. Olazo-Cardenas & Fabriccio J. Visconti-Lopez & Antonio Barrenechea-Pulache, 2022. "What Drives Abdominal Obesity in Peru? A Multilevel Analysis Approach Using a Nationally Representative Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:23:p:7089-:d:1284209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.