IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i22p7039-d1276737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking the WHO’s Age-Friendly Healthcare Principles: Portugal’s Quest and Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Jéssica Tavares

    (GOVCOPP, Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Gonçalo Santinha

    (GOVCOPP, Department of Social, Political and Territorial Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Nelson Pacheco Rocha

    (IEETA, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

Countries worldwide are grappling with a pressing demographic challenge characterized by a growing older population. This poses a significant healthcare dilemma, presenting challenges for healthcare systems and providers. To address these challenges, the World Health Organization (WHO) has devised a set of Age-Friendly Principles, aimed at optimizing healthcare provision for older people. This article delves into the current state of healthcare adaptation for older adults in Portugal and assesses the implementation of the WHO Principles. Case studies were conducted in three distinct regions of Portugal, involving semistructured interviews with key decision makers from both the healthcare sector and organizations wielding direct influence over health policies ( n = 11). A comprehensive content analysis was conducted employing the webQDA software. The findings unveiled a noteworthy trend in which most interviewees displayed limited familiarity with the WHO Principles. Nevertheless, all interviewees acknowledged the need to adapt the healthcare system accordingly. Strengths were identified, primarily within the healthcare management system, but noteworthy gaps were also revealed, particularly in terms of facility preparedness and professional training. Interviewees proposed various interventions to enhance age-friendly healthcare provision; however, they concurrently pinpointed challenges related to human resources, infrastructure, and financial management. In their concluding recommendations, interviewees underscored the development of tools to facilitate the application and evaluation of the WHO Principles, as well as the development by the WHO of an accreditation system to encourage the application of the principles in healthcare providers across the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Jéssica Tavares & Gonçalo Santinha & Nelson Pacheco Rocha, 2023. "Unlocking the WHO’s Age-Friendly Healthcare Principles: Portugal’s Quest and Recommendations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:22:p:7039-:d:1276737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/22/7039/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/22/7039/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jéssica Tavares & Gonçalo Santinha & Nelson Pacheco Rocha, 2023. "Implementation of the World Health Organization Age-Friendly Principles: A Case Study from Portugal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Liz Green & Kathryn Ashton & Mark A. Bellis & Timo Clemens & Margaret Douglas, 2021. "‘Health in All Policies’—A Key Driver for Health and Well-Being in a Post-COVID-19 Pandemic World," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Jungwirth & Daniela Haluza, 2023. "Sports and the Pandemic: The Impact of COVID-19 on Active Living and Life Satisfaction of Climbers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Sanjay Pattanshetty & Kiran Bhatt & Aniruddha Inamdar & Viola Dsouza & Vijay Kumar Chattu & Helmut Brand, 2023. "Health Diplomacy as a Tool to Build Resilient Health Systems in Conflict Settings—A Case of Sudan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Liz Green & Kathryn Ashton & Lee Parry-Williams & Mariana Dyakova & Timo Clemens & Mark A. Bellis, 2022. "Facilitators, Barriers and Views on the Role of Public Health Institutes in Promoting and Using Health Impact Assessment—An International Virtual Scoping Survey and Expert Interviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:22:p:7039-:d:1276737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.