IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i16p6586-d1218549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Mental Health Approaches to Online Radicalisation: An Empty Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Rabya Mughal

    (Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Public Health, Herchel Smith Building, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, UK)

  • Valerie DeMarinis

    (Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
    Innlandet Hospital Trust, 2312 Ottestad, Norway
    Center for Research on Extremism, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway)

  • Maria Nordendahl

    (Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Hassan Lone

    (St George’s Medical School, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK)

  • Veronica Phillips

    (School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge Medical Library, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK)

  • Eolene Boyd-MacMillan

    (Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Public Health, Herchel Smith Building, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, UK)

Abstract

This systematic review seeks to position online radicalisation within whole system frameworks incorporating individual, family, community and wider structural influences whilst reporting evidence of public mental health approaches for individuals engaging in radical online content. Methods: the authors searched Medline (via Ovid), PsycInfo (via Ebscohost) and Web of Science (Core Collection) with the use of Boolean operators across “extremism”, “online content” and “intervention”. Results: Following full-text assessments, all retrieved papers were excluded. No publications fulfilled the primary objective of reporting public mental health interventions specifically addressing online radicalisation. However, six publications fulfilled the secondary objective of identifying theoretical and conceptual relationships amongst elements in the three inclusion criteria (online extremism, psychological outcomes and intervention strategy) that could inform interventions within public mental health frameworks. These publications were quality assessed and discussed following the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care guide for reporting empty reviews. Conclusions: there is an immediate need for further research in this field given the increase in different factions of radicalised beliefs resulting from online, particularly social media, usage.

Suggested Citation

  • Rabya Mughal & Valerie DeMarinis & Maria Nordendahl & Hassan Lone & Veronica Phillips & Eolene Boyd-MacMillan, 2023. "Public Mental Health Approaches to Online Radicalisation: An Empty Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(16), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:16:p:6586-:d:1218549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/16/6586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/16/6586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fledderus, M. & Bohlmeijer, E.T. & Smit, F. & Westerhof, G.J., 2010. "Mental health promotion as a new goal in public mental health care: A randomized controlled trial of an intervention enhancing psychological flexibility," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(12), pages 2372-2378.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Hendriks & Tobi Graafsma & Aabidien Hassankhan & Ernst Bohlmeijer & Joop de Jong, 2018. "Strengths and virtues and the development of resilience: A qualitative study in Suriname during a time of economic crisis," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(2), pages 180-188, March.
    2. Andrew J. Howell & Holli-Anne Passmore, 2019. "Acceptance and Commitment Training (ACT) as a Positive Psychological Intervention: A Systematic Review and Initial Meta-analysis Regarding ACT’s Role in Well-Being Promotion Among University Students," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 1995-2010, August.
    3. Yu‐Ming Wang & Joy Johnson & Bih‐Ching Shu & Shih‐Ming Li, 2014. "Towards the development of a gender‐sensitive measure of women's mental health," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(9-10), pages 1227-1234, May.
    4. Martha Okafor & Daniel F. Sarpong & Aneeqah Ferguson & David Satcher, 2013. "Improving Health Outcomes of Children through Effective Parenting: Model and Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Maame Afua Boatemaa & Kwaku Oppong Asante & Collins Badu Agyemang, 2019. "The Moderating Role of Psychological Flexibility in the Relationship Between Organizational Commitment, Workaholism, Job Security, and Corporate Entrepreneurship Among Information Technology Workers i," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, August.
    6. Susan J. Ferguson & Alan J. Taylor & Catherine McMahon, 2017. "Hope for the Future and Avoidance of the Present: Associations with Well-being in Older Adults," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(5), pages 1485-1506, October.
    7. Maddison Campbell & Kenneth I. Pakenham, 2022. "Evaluation of a Brief Mindfulness Program for People with Multiple Sclerosis Delivered in the Community Over Five Years," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(2), pages 1019-1041, April.
    8. Jannis Kraiss & Kleinjan Redelinghuys & Laura. A. Weiss, 2022. "The effects of psychological interventions on well-being measured with the Mental Health Continuum: a meta-analysis," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 3655-3689, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:16:p:6586-:d:1218549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.