IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i15p6520-d1210319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Healthcare Professionals and Noise-Generating Tools: Challenging Assumptions about Hearing Loss Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Alberti

    (Department of Adult and Development Age Human Pathology “Gaetano Barresi”, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy)

  • Daniele Portelli

    (Department of Adult and Development Age Human Pathology “Gaetano Barresi”, Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
    Policlinico G. Martino, Via Consolare Valeria 1, 98125 Messina, Italy)

  • Cosimo Galletti

    (Department of Integrated Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, 08017 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Hearing loss is a significant global health concern, affecting billions of people and leading to various physical, mental, and social consequences. This paper focuses on the risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) among specific healthcare professionals, especially ear surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, dentists, and dental hygienists, who frequently use noisy instruments in their professions. While studies on these professionals’ noise exposure levels are limited, certain conditions and factors could pose a risk to their hearing. Measures such as engineering and administrative controls, regular audiometric testing, and the use of hearing protection devices are crucial in preventing NIHL. Early detection and intervention are also vital to mitigate further damage. This paper proposes the results of a modified screening protocol, including questionnaires, audiometry, and additional diagnostic tests to identify and address potential hearing disorders. Specific healthcare professionals should remain aware of the risks, prioritize hearing protection, and undergo regular monitoring to safeguard their long-term auditory well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Alberti & Daniele Portelli & Cosimo Galletti, 2023. "Healthcare Professionals and Noise-Generating Tools: Challenging Assumptions about Hearing Loss Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6520-:d:1210319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6520/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6520/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chanbeom Kwak & Woojae Han, 2021. "The Effectiveness of Hearing Protection Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Agnieszka Jaszczak & Ewelina Pochodyła & Katarina Kristianova & Natalia Małkowska & Jan K. Kazak, 2021. "Redefinition of Park Design Criteria as a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huixin Wang & Jing Xie & Shixian Luo & Duy Thong Ta & Qian Wang & Jiao Zhang & Daer Su & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Exploring the Interplay between Landscape Planning and Human Well-Being: A Scientometric Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita & Noszczyk, Tomasz & Gorzelany, Julia & Młocek, Wojciech, 2024. "Greenery in times of crisis: Accessibility, residents' travel preferences and the impact of travel time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6520-:d:1210319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.