IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i15p6478-d1207068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allied Health Professions Accreditation Standards for Work Integrated Learning: A Document Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Merrolee Penman

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
    School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Jacqueline Raymond

    (School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Annora Kumar

    (Medical School, Health and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Renae Y. R. Liang

    (School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia)

  • Karen Sundar

    (Curtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Yvonne Thomas

    (School of Occupational Therapy, Otago Polytechnic, Te Pūkenga, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand)

Abstract

A key role of allied health (AH) professional regulatory and professional bodies is to ensure that AH education programs provide work-integrated learning (WIL) opportunities for students. The requirements are outlined via the respective profession’s educational accreditation standards. Although a significant component of the AH professional degrees, researchers have not explored how standards specific to WIL are developed, nor how WIL might be conceptualised through the standards. This study explored how WIL is conceptualised through comparing the WIL education standards across Australian AH professions. Using a non-experimental explanatory mixed-methods research design, a document analysis of Australian education program accreditation standards (and associated documents) for 15 AH professions was undertaken. Data analysis included inductive textual and thematic analyses to compare AH professionals’ conceptualisation of WIL. This study found a high degree of variation in how AH professions describe WIL. While there was a common requirement for students to demonstrate competency in WIL, requirements for WIL quantity, assessment and supervision varied. Four key themes were identified regarding the contribution of WIL to curriculum and student learning: (1) the relationship between WIL and the program curriculum; (2) WIL as a learning process; (3) learning from diverse WIL contexts; and (4) developing competence through WIL. Overall, the diversity in the standards reflected differing understandings of what WIL is. Thus, in the absence of frameworks for designing accreditation standards, the risk is that some AH professions will continue to perpetuate the myth that the primary purpose of WIL is to provide a bridge between theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Merrolee Penman & Jacqueline Raymond & Annora Kumar & Renae Y. R. Liang & Karen Sundar & Yvonne Thomas, 2023. "Allied Health Professions Accreditation Standards for Work Integrated Learning: A Document Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6478-:d:1207068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/15/6478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akiko Maeda & Karolina Socha-Dietrich, 2021. "Skills for the future health workforce: Preparing health professionals for people-centred care," OECD Health Working Papers 124, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:15:p:6478-:d:1207068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.