IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i13p6222-d1178773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best Practices for Notification of Unexpected, Violent, and Traumatic Death: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Diego De Leo

    (Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4122, Australia
    Slovene Centre for Suicide Research, Primorska University, 6000 Koper, Slovenia
    De Leo Fund, 35137 Padua, Italy)

  • Josephine Zammarrelli

    (De Leo Fund, 35137 Padua, Italy)

  • Giulia Marinato

    (De Leo Fund, 35137 Padua, Italy)

  • Marta Capelli

    (De Leo Fund, 35137 Padua, Italy)

  • Andrea Viecelli Giannotti

    (De Leo Fund, 35137 Padua, Italy)

Abstract

Background: Death reporting is a delicate task. The ways in which it is carried out can have a significant impact on both the recipient and the notifier, especially in the event of a sudden, violent, and traumatic death. Empathetic, sensitive, and attentive communication with survivors can represent a first opportunity to support the bereavement process. The acquisition of specific skills for the delivery of the death notification is necessary for the professional who carries out the communication to increase self-efficacy, knowledge, and perception of competence in this area. Objective: To map what the literature has produced on the theme of best practices for the notification of unexpected, violent, and traumatic deaths and to provide guidance for the formulation of appropriate best practices and the development of effective educational programs. Methods: A review was conducted using the PRISMA Scoping Review extension on English language literature published between 1966 and 2022. Results: Starting from the initial 3781 titles, 67 articles were selected. From a thematic point of view, the analysis of the contents made it possible to identify five dimensions: (1) general guidelines in relation to various professional figures; (2) specific protocols; (3) guidelines for notifying death to children; (4) guidelines for notification of death by telephone; and (5) recommendations and suggestions for death notification training programs. Discussion: Death notification is configured as a process, divided into sequential phases. The act of notification constitutes the central phase during which communication is carried out. The communication of death is context-specific; therefore, it should require the creation of specific protocols for the various professions involved in the task, along with targeted theoretical and practical training. Conclusions: The importance of defining specific guidelines for the various professionals and standardized programs of theoretical and practical training emerges. The implementation of future sectoral studies will allow evaluations of the effectiveness of these protocols and programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego De Leo & Josephine Zammarrelli & Giulia Marinato & Marta Capelli & Andrea Viecelli Giannotti, 2023. "Best Practices for Notification of Unexpected, Violent, and Traumatic Death: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:13:p:6222-:d:1178773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/13/6222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/13/6222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diego De Leo & Annalisa Guarino & Benedetta Congregalli & Josephine Zammarrelli & Anna Valle & Stefano Paoloni & Sabrina Cipolletta, 2022. "Receiving Notification of Unexpected and Violent Death: A Qualitative Study of Italian Survivors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Diego De Leo & Benedetta Congregalli & Annalisa Guarino & Josephine Zammarrelli & Anna Valle & Stefano Paoloni & Sabrina Cipolletta, 2022. "Communicating Unexpected and Violent Death: The Experiences of Police Officers and Health Care Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:13:p:6222-:d:1178773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.