IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i11p5981-d1158099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Combined with the Resilience Model to Decrease Depression and Anxiety Symptoms and Increase the Quality of Life in ESRD Patients Treated with Hemodialysis

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina J. González-Flores

    (Centro Universitario de la Cienega, University of Guadalajara, Ocotlán 47820, Mexico)

  • Guillermo Garcia-Garcia

    (Nephrology Department, Civil Hospital de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara 44280, Mexico)

  • Claudia Lerma

    (Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, México City 14080, Mexico)

  • Rebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, San Juan Tilcuautla 42160, Mexico)

  • Abel Lerma

    (Institute of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, San Juan Tilcuautla 42160, Mexico)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of cognitive behavioral intervention (CBI) combined with the resilience model (CBI + R) vs CBI alone on depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and quality of life of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis replacement therapy. Method: Fifty-three subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The control group ( n = 25) was provided with treatment strategies based on a cognitive behavioral approach, while the experimental group ( n = 28) were given the same techniques plus resilience model strategies. Five psychological instruments were applied: Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Mexican Resilience Scale, cognitive distortions scale, and the Kidney Disease related Quality of Life questionnaire. Participants were assessed at baseline (before treatment), eight weeks later (end of treatment), and four weeks after the end of treatment (follow up). The results were analyzed by ANOVA for repeated measures with a Bonferroni-adjusted test method, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: The experimental group had significant differences in total and somatic depression as well as differences in the dimensions of cognitive distortions and a significant increase in the dimensions of resilience. The control group had significant differences in all variables but showed lower scores in the evaluated times. Conclusions: The resilience model strengthens and enhances the effectiveness of the cognitive behavioral approach to reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in patients with ESRD.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina J. González-Flores & Guillermo Garcia-Garcia & Claudia Lerma & Rebeca María Elena Guzmán-Saldaña & Abel Lerma, 2023. "Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Intervention Combined with the Resilience Model to Decrease Depression and Anxiety Symptoms and Increase the Quality of Life in ESRD Patients Treated with Hemodialysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:5981-:d:1158099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/5981/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/5981/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui‐Ching Chien & Yu‐Chu Chung & Mei‐Ling Yeh & Jia‐Fu Lee, 2015. "Breathing exercise combined with cognitive behavioural intervention improves sleep quality and heart rate variability in major depression," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(21-22), pages 3206-3214, November.
    2. Cristina J. González-Flores & Guillermo García-García & Abel Lerma & Héctor Pérez-Grovas & Rosa M. Meda-Lara & Rebeca M. E. Guzmán-Saldaña & Claudia Lerma, 2021. "Resilience: A Protective Factor from Depression and Anxiety in Mexican Dialysis Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:5981-:d:1158099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.