IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i10p5828-d1147790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Physiotherapists Explain Influencing Factors to Chronic Low Back Pain? A Qualitative Study Using a Fictive Case of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Author

Listed:
  • Rob Vanderstraeten

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Antoine Fourré

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
    Department of Neurosciences, Université de Mons, 7000 Mons, Belgium)

  • Isaline Demeure

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Christophe Demoulin

    (Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liege, EVAREVA, 4000 Liege, Belgium
    Faculty of Motricity Sciences, UCLouvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium)

  • Jozef Michielsen

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
    Anatomy and Research Centre (ASTARC), University Hospital of Antwerp, Antwerp Surgical Training, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Sibyl Anthierens

    (Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Hilde Bastiaens

    (Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
    Shared last author.)

  • Nathalie Roussel

    (Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
    Shared last author.)

Abstract

Background: While pain is influenced by multiple factors including psychosocial factors, previous research has shown that physiotherapists still favour a biomedical approach. Purpose: To evaluate: (1) how physiotherapists explain the patient’s chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP); (2) whether physiotherapists use one or multiple influencing factors, and (3) whether these factors are framed in a biopsychosocial or biomedical approach. Materials and methods: This exploratory qualitative study uses a vignette depicting chronic non-specific LBP and employs a flexible framework analysis. Physiotherapists were asked to mention contributing factors to the pain based on this vignette. Five themes were predefined (“Beliefs”, “Previous experiences”, “Emotions”, “Patients behaviour”, “Contextual factors”) and explored. Results: Physiotherapists use very brief explanations when reporting contributing factors to chronic pain (median 13 words). Out of 670 physiotherapists, only 40% mentioned more than two different themes and 2/3rds did not see any link between the patients’ misbeliefs and pain. Only a quarter of the participants mentioned the patient’s worries about pain and movement, which is considered to be an important influencing factor. Conclusion: The lack of a multifactorial approach and the persistent biomedical beliefs suggest that it remains a challenge for physiotherapists to fully integrate the biopsychosocial framework into their management of chronic LBP.

Suggested Citation

  • Rob Vanderstraeten & Antoine Fourré & Isaline Demeure & Christophe Demoulin & Jozef Michielsen & Sibyl Anthierens & Hilde Bastiaens & Nathalie Roussel, 2023. "How Do Physiotherapists Explain Influencing Factors to Chronic Low Back Pain? A Qualitative Study Using a Fictive Case of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5828-:d:1147790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5828/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5828/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ben Darlow & James Stanley & Sarah Dean & J Haxby Abbott & Sue Garrett & Ross Wilson & Fiona Mathieson & Anthony Dowell, 2019. "The Fear Reduction Exercised Early (FREE) approach to management of low back pain in general practice: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5828-:d:1147790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.