IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p446-d1016783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Effective Are Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Reducing Stress and Weight? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Sosa-Cordobés

    (Department of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo

    (Department of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • José Luis Sánchez-Ramos

    (Department of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • Francisca María García-Padilla

    (Department of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • Elia Fernández-Martínez

    (Department of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

  • Almudena Garrido-Fernández

    (Department of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain)

Abstract

Stress contributes to the development and maintenance of obesity. Mindfulness-based therapies are being used to reduce stress and promote weight reduction and maintenance. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions for stress and weight reduction in the short, medium, and long term. Searches on PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, WOS, and Science Direct were conducted until March 2021. Intervention studies with a sample of adults were included; these evaluated a mindfulness-based intervention and used stress and weight or body mass index as outcome variables. These criteria were met by 13 articles. A meta-analysis of 8 of the 13 articles was performed with a random-effects or fixed-effects model, depending on the level of heterogeneity between studies. Mindfulness-based interventions had a small effect on stress reduction over a 3-month period: effect size (standardized mean difference) = −0.29 (95% CI: −0.49, −0.10). However, no significant evidence was found for stress reduction from 3 months onwards, nor for weight or body mass index reduction in any period. Mindfulness-based interventions are effective in reducing stress in the short term, but not in the medium or long term, nor are they effective for weight or body mass index. More robust and longer study designs are needed to determine their effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Sosa-Cordobés & Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo & José Luis Sánchez-Ramos & Francisca María García-Padilla & Elia Fernández-Martínez & Almudena Garrido-Fernández, 2022. "How Effective Are Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Reducing Stress and Weight? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:446-:d:1016783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/446/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/446/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kontopantelis, Evangelos & Reeves, David, 2009. "MetaEasy: A Meta-Analysis Add-In for Microsoft Excel," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 30(i07).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:jss:jstsof:36:i03 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Wallace, Byron C. & Dahabreh, Issa J. & Trikalinos, Thomas A. & Lau, Joseph & Trow, Paul & Schmid, Christopher H., 2012. "Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users: R as a Computational Back-End," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 49(i05).
    3. Jonathan Stokes & Maria Panagioti & Rahul Alam & Kath Checkland & Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi & Peter Bower, 2015. "Effectiveness of Case Management for 'At Risk' Patients in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-42, July.
    4. Evangelos Kontopantelis & David Reeves, 2010. "metaan: Random-effects meta-analysis," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 10(3), pages 395-407, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:446-:d:1016783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.