Author
Listed:
- Thilini Sudeshika
(Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya 20400, Sri Lanka)
- Mark Naunton
(Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia)
- Gregory M. Peterson
(Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia)
- Louise S. Deeks
(Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia)
- Line Guénette
(Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, QC GIV 0A6, Canada)
- Ravi Sharma
(Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Luton LU4 0DZ, UK)
- Christopher Freeman
(School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia
Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)
- Theo Niyonsenga
(Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia)
- Sam Kosari
(Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia)
Abstract
As team-based care continues to evolve, pharmacists have been included in general practice teams in many countries, to varying extents, to improve medication use and patient safety. However, evidence on interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness of pharmacists in general practice is sparse. This study aimed to compare the extent of interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness of general practice pharmacists in Australia with international sites (Canada and the UK), and identify the factors associated with interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness. General practice pharmacists from Australia, Canada, and the UK were identified through professional organisations and networks, and invited to participate in an online survey, adapted from existing validated tools. The survey explored interprofessional collaboration through four sub-domains (professional interactions, relationship initiation, trust and role clarity, and commitment to collaboration) and team effectiveness of general practice pharmacists. Of the 101 respondents (26 from Australia, 44 from Canada and 31 from the UK), 79% were female and 78% were aged below 50 years. Interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness appeared to be high and similar between countries. Total scores for collaboration of pharmacists were 86.1 ± 7.4 in Australia, 88.5 ± 7.5 in the UK, and 89.1 ± 7.3 in Canada (mean ± SD, where higher scores represent more advanced collaboration), while the team effectiveness scores of the pharmacists were 88.6 ± 14.6 in Canada, 91.8 ± 14.6 in Australia and 97.5 ± 14.0 in the UK. Pharmacists who had worked in general practice for a longer time showed advanced interprofessional collaboration while those who worked exclusively in general practice had higher scores for team effectiveness. Overall, general practice pharmacists in the three countries were highly collaborative with general practitioners. Long-term employment and longer work hours could enhance interprofessional collaboration and team effectiveness in general practice pharmacists by improving trust and working relationships over time.
Suggested Citation
Thilini Sudeshika & Mark Naunton & Gregory M. Peterson & Louise S. Deeks & Line Guénette & Ravi Sharma & Christopher Freeman & Theo Niyonsenga & Sam Kosari, 2022.
"Interprofessional Collaboration and Team Effectiveness of Pharmacists in General Practice: A Cross-National Survey,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:394-:d:1015930
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:394-:d:1015930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.