IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5393-d804844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Aging-Friendly Kitchen Based on Space Syntax Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Wang

    (Universal Design Institute, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    Silk and Fashion Culture Research Center of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Di Lin

    (Universal Design Institute, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Ze Huang

    (Universal Design Institute, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

Abstract

As a result of aging populations globally, a growing number of older adults prefer to age in place; therefore, it is essential to study the spatial adaptability of the house. This study aimed to explore the relationship between the efficiency of daily activities and the spatial layout of home kitchens in the elderly population, and to assess the moderating role of cognitive function. Twenty-one elderly participants completed the experiment, including non-cognitively impaired ( n = 12) and cognitively impaired groups ( n = 9). Their home kitchen space was partitioned in plan and elevation based on space syntax theory. They were required to complete three tasks (i.e., an easy task, a medium task, and a difficult task) in their respective kitchens. The relationship between the efficiency of different tasks’ completion and the corresponding kitchen space attributes (integration, mean depth) was examined. The results showed a significant association between the home kitchen space layout of homebound older adults and their kitchen activity efficiency. In addition, a positive moderating effect of cognitive ability was found in the association between moderate and difficult tasks ( p < 0.05), and its effect appeared to be stronger under challenging tasks ( p < 0.01). The results of this study may help provide a basis for future design and optimization of aging-friendly residential spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Wang & Di Lin & Ze Huang, 2022. "Research on the Aging-Friendly Kitchen Based on Space Syntax Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5393-:d:804844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5393/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teck Hong Tan & Ji Hei Lee, 2022. "Residential environment, third places and well-being in Malaysian older adults," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 721-738, July.
    2. Zhenhua Zheng & Hong Chen, 2021. "The Relationship among Community Environment, Behavior, Activity Ability, and Self-Rated Health of Older Adults: A Hierarchical and Multi-Dimensional Comparative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Anna Lewandowska & Bogdan Branowski & Katarzyna Joachimiak-Lechman & Przemyslaw Kurczewski & Jaroslaw Selech & Marek Zablocki, 2017. "Sustainable Design: A Case of Environmental and Cost Life Cycle Assessment of a Kitchen Designed for Seniors and Disabled People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Zhenhua Zheng & Hong Chen & Junling Gao, 2021. "Age Differences in the Influence of Residential Environment and Behavior on the Life Quality of Older Adults: The Transfer from Physical-Environment to Social-Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhidiankui Xu & Yu Wu & Yixi Bao & Jiawei Li & Zhengzhong Zhou, 2023. "Using Co-Design to Explore New Trends in Future Kitchen Designs: An Exploratory Workshop Study of College Students in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Zhidiankui Xu & Yixi Bao & Hua Dong & Yu Wu & Guyue Tang, 2024. "Heart of the future home: a multidimensional model of inclusive kitchen for older people in the UK," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrzej Pacana & Dominika Siwiec & Robert Ulewicz & Malgorzata Ulewicz, 2024. "A Novelty Model Employing the Quality Life Cycle Assessment (QLCA) Indicator and Frameworks for Selecting Qualitative and Environmental Aspects for Sustainable Product Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Bogdan Branowski & Marek Zabłocki & Maciej Sydor, 2019. "The Material Indices Method in the Sustainable Engineering Design Process: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Marko Jausovec & Metka Sitar, 2019. "Comparative Evaluation Model Framework for Cost-Optimal Evaluation of Prefabricated Lightweight System Envelopes in the Early Design Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Jianbo Han & Edwin H. W. Chan & Esther H. K. Yung & Queena K. Qian & Patrick T. I. Lam, 2022. "A Policy Framework for Producing Age-Friendly Communities from the Perspective of Production of Space," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Catherine Sundling & Marianne Jakobsson, 2023. "How Do Urban Walking Environments Impact Pedestrians’ Experience and Psychological Health? A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-32, July.
    6. Kristina Čižiūnienė & Jonas Matijošius & Audrius Čereška & Artūras Petraška, 2020. "Algorithm for Reducing Truck Noise on Via Baltica Transport Corridors in Lithuania," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Zhidiankui Xu & Yixi Bao & Hua Dong & Yu Wu & Guyue Tang, 2024. "Heart of the future home: a multidimensional model of inclusive kitchen for older people in the UK," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Chia-Jung Lee & Yen Hsu, 2021. "Promoting the Quality of Life of Elderly during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Paweł Lonkwic & Krzysztof Przystupa & Tomasz Krakowski & Hubert Ruta, 2020. "Case Study of Support Frame Optimization Using a Distant Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Feng Jiang & Jing Wang & Lufa Zhang & Jin Luo & Li Li & Ruilong Wu, 2023. "Community Environment Co-Production and Environmental Satisfaction of Older Urban Residents in Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-11, February.
    11. Oleksandra Shepel & Jonas Matijošius & Alfredas Rimkus & Kamil Duda & Maciej Mikulski, 2021. "Research of Parameters of a Compression Ignition Engine Using Various Fuel Mixtures of Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) and Fatty Acid Esters (FAE)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Philip Arestis & Mianshan Lai & Songpei Zhang & Yunxiang Liu, 2023. "The Impact of Rural Land on the Life Satisfaction of Farming Women: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Bogdan Branowski & Marek Zabłocki & Przemysław Kurczewski & Maciej Sydor, 2022. "A Method for Modeling the Individual Convenient Zone of a Human," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-12, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5393-:d:804844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.