IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5241-d802185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eye-Tracking in Assessment of the Mental Workload of Harvester Operators

Author

Listed:
  • Bartłomiej Naskrent

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

  • Witold Grzywiński

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Polowy

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

  • Arkadiusz Tomczak

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

  • Tomasz Jelonek

    (Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

Harvesting large quantities of timber requires the use of various technical means, including harvesters. The introduction of machine logging has greatly improved safety and reduced accident rates but has also resulted in the risk of musculoskeletal disorders and increased psychological strain. The aim of this study was to determine the level of the mental workload of harvester operators in wind-damaged stands, during daytime and nighttime clearfelling, and during late thinning using the technique of eye-tracking (analysis of saccades and pupil dilation). The highest number of saccades for both felling and processing operations was recorded during daytime and nighttime clearcutting, while the lowest number was recorded in late thinning. For both operations, the highest mean saccade duration was found in late thinning (felling 38.7 ms, processing 36.0 ms) and the lowest in nighttime cutting (felling 33.1 ms, processing 35.5 ms). The highest frequency of saccades in both operations was recorded in clearcut areas during both daytime and nighttime operations. The largest mean pupil diameters during saccades were recorded in night clearfelling plots (felling 5.57 mm, processing 5.52 mm), while the smallest were recorded in plots with windbreaks (felling 2.91 mm, processing 2.89 mm). Comparison of the number, duration, frequency, and time proportion of saccades as well as pupil diameter provided a quantifiable assessment of mental workload in clearcut, wind-damaged, and thinning stands. The indicators analyzed showed that the cutting category can significantly affect the level of mental workload and thus fatigue of harvester operators.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartłomiej Naskrent & Witold Grzywiński & Krzysztof Polowy & Arkadiusz Tomczak & Tomasz Jelonek, 2022. "Eye-Tracking in Assessment of the Mental Workload of Harvester Operators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5241-:d:802185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5241/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5241/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Da Tao & Haibo Tan & Hailiang Wang & Xu Zhang & Xingda Qu & Tingru Zhang, 2019. "A Systematic Review of Physiological Measures of Mental Workload," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yewei Ouyang & Cheng Cheng & Dan Wang & Shiyi He & Lan Zheng, 2023. "The Design of a Posture Instruction Atlas and the Prevention of Construction Workers’ Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs): A Study on Attention Allocation and Cognitive Load Based on Eye Tr," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Yurong Fan & Jin Liang & Xiaodong Cao & Liping Pang & Jie Zhang, 2022. "Effects of Noise Exposure and Mental Workload on Physiological Responses during Task Execution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5241-:d:802185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.