IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i9p5019-d798201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Factors Influencing Polish Students’ Opinions on Euthanasia

Author

Listed:
  • Iga Stokłosa

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Maciej Stokłosa

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Gniewko Więckiewicz

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland)

  • Mateusz Porwolik

    (Department of Ophtalmology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-514 Katowice, Poland)

  • Maciej Bugajski

    (National Research Institute of Oncology, State Research Institute, 31-115 Krakow, Poland)

  • Wilhelm Masarczyk

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland)

  • Tomasz Męcik-Kronenberg

    (Department of Pathomorphology, Medical Univeristy of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland)

  • Magdalena Piegza

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland)

  • Robert Pudlo

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland)

  • Piotr Gorczyca

    (Department and Clinic of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia, 42-612 Tarnowskie Gory, Poland)

Abstract

Due to the continuous development of palliative care and methods of pain relief in the last moments of patients’ lives, we are faced with the question of how long we should take measures to delay inevitable death for, without providing prolonged therapy against the patient’s will. For terminally ill and people experiencing unimaginable suffering, euthanasia is considered as one of the possible options for a dignified farewell. The aim of the study was to determine the views on euthanasia in a group of students from Polish universities. Questionnaire responses were analyzed for 9686 students (79.9% of women and 20.1% of men) aged 18–35 years. Respondents were asked to complete their own questionnaire on demographic data and attitudes toward euthanasia in the case of severe terminal illness or paralysis preventing independent living. Euthanasia was significantly more acceptable among women (85% vs. 75%, p < 0.0001; 69% vs. 62%, p < 0.0001) and non-believers [98% vs. 97% (denominations other than Christian), 84% (other forms of Christianity), 69% (Roman Catholic); p < 0.0001] in every case considered. Religious affiliation was the factor that most influenced attitudes toward euthanasia. Among the other elements influencing attitudes toward euthanasia, residence and field of study were distinguished. Considering the large sample size and specific conclusions, the article should be an important argument in the discussion on euthanasia.

Suggested Citation

  • Iga Stokłosa & Maciej Stokłosa & Gniewko Więckiewicz & Mateusz Porwolik & Maciej Bugajski & Wilhelm Masarczyk & Tomasz Męcik-Kronenberg & Magdalena Piegza & Robert Pudlo & Piotr Gorczyca, 2022. "Analysis of Factors Influencing Polish Students’ Opinions on Euthanasia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-11, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5019-:d:798201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5019/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5019/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maciej Stokłosa & Iga Stokłosa & Mateusz Porwolik & Maciej Bugajski & Gniewko Więckiewicz & Tomasz Męcik-Kronenberg & Magdalena Piegza & Robert Pudlo & Piotr Gorczyca, 2021. "Mercy Procedure or a Nightmare? Attitude towards Pregnancy Termination among Polish University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:9:p:5019-:d:798201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.