IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4695-d792974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ability of Wearable Accelerometers-Based Measures to Assess the Stability of Working Postures

Author

Listed:
  • Liangjie Guo

    (Department of Safety Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Junhui Kou

    (Department of Safety Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Mingyu Wu

    (Department of Safety Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development and widespread application of wearable inertial sensors in the field of human motion capture, the low-cost and non-invasive accelerometer (ACC) based measures have been widely used for working postural stability assessment. This study systematically investigated the abilities of ACC-based measures to assess the stability of working postures in terms of the ability to detect the effects of work-related factors and the ability to classify stable and unstable working postures. Thirty young males participated in this study and performed twenty-four load-holding tasks (six working postures × two standing surfaces × two holding loads), and forty-three ACC-based measures were derived from the ACC data obtained by using a 17 inertial sensors-based motion capture system. ANOVAs, t -tests and machine learning (ML) methods were adopted to study the factors’ effects detection ability and the postural stability classification ability. The results show that almost all forty-three ACC-based measures could ( p < 0.05) detect the main effects of Working Posture and Load Carriage, and their interaction effects. However, most of them failed in ( p ≥ 0.05) detecting Standing Surface’s main or interaction effects. Five measures could detect both main and interaction effects of all the three factors, which are recommended for working postural stability assessment. The performance in postural stability classification based on ML was also good, and the feature set exerted a greater influence on the classification accuracy than sensor configuration (i.e., sensor placement locations). The results show that the pelvis and lower legs are recommended locations overall, in which the pelvis is the first choice. The findings of this study have proved that wearable ACC-based measures could assess the stability of working postures, including the work-related factors’ effects detection ability and stable-unstable working postures classification ability. However, researchers should pay more attention to the measure selection, sensors placement, feature selection and extraction in practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Liangjie Guo & Junhui Kou & Mingyu Wu, 2022. "Ability of Wearable Accelerometers-Based Measures to Assess the Stability of Working Postures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4695-:d:792974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4695/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4695/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rigoberto Martinez-Mendez & Masaki Sekine & Toshiyo Tamura, 2012. "Postural sway parameters using a triaxial accelerometer: comparing elderly and young healthy adults," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(9), pages 899-910.
    2. A. Rouis & N. Rezzoug & P. Gorce, 2014. "Validity of a low-cost wearable device for body sway parameter evaluation," Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(S1), pages 182-183, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4695-:d:792974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.