IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4505-d789765.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Observational Study Exploring the Efficacy and Effectiveness of a New Model of Peer-Assisted Simulation-Based Learning Clinical Placement

Author

Listed:
  • Diane Dennis

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia
    Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands 6009, Australia)

  • Lora Cipriano

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia
    Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands 6009, Australia)

  • Ginny Mulvey

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia)

  • Stephanie Parkinson

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia)

  • Alan Reubenson

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia)

  • Anne Furness

    (Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6845, Australia)

Abstract

(1) Background: Immersive simulation-based learning is relevant and effective in health care professional pre-licensure training. Peer-assisted learning has reciprocal benefit for the learner and the teacher. A fully simulated model of fieldwork placement has been utilised at Curtin University since 2014, historically employing full-time faculty supervisors. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, traditional clinical placement availability diminished. (2) Methods: This mixed-methods prospective observational study aimed to translate the existing faculty-led placement for penultimate-year physiotherapy students to a peer-taught model, thereby creating new teaching placements for final-year students. Final- and penultimate-year physiotherapy students undertook the fully simulated fieldwork placement either as peer learners or peer teachers. The placement was then evaluated using four outcome measures: The ‘measure of quality of giving feedback scale’ (MQF) was used to assess peer learner satisfaction with peer-teacher supervision; plus/delta reflections were provided by peer teachers and faculty supervisors; student pass/fail rates for the penultimate-year physiotherapy students. (3) Results: For 10 weeks during November and December 2020, 195 students and 19 faculty participated in the placement. Mean MQF scores ranged from 6.4 (SD 0.86) to 6.8 (SD) out of 7; qualitative data reflected positive and negative aspects of the experience. There was a 4% fail rate for penultimate-year students for the placement. Results suggested that peer learners perceived peer-led feedback was of a high quality; there were both positives and challenges experienced using the model. (4) Conclusions: Physiotherapy students effectively adopted a peer-taught fully simulated fieldwork placement model with minimal faculty supervision, and comparable clinical competency outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane Dennis & Lora Cipriano & Ginny Mulvey & Stephanie Parkinson & Alan Reubenson & Anne Furness, 2022. "Observational Study Exploring the Efficacy and Effectiveness of a New Model of Peer-Assisted Simulation-Based Learning Clinical Placement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4505-:d:789765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4505/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4505/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4505-:d:789765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.