IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i8p4444-d788811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Responding to Suicide Clusters in the Community: What Do Existing Suicide Cluster Response Frameworks Recommend and How Are They Implemented?

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole T. M. Hill

    (Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
    Centre for Child Health Research, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia)

  • Jo Robinson

    (Orygen, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
    Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parville, VIC 3052, Australia)

Abstract

Suicide clusters involve an excessive number of suicides, suicide attempts, or both, that occur close in space or time or involve social links between cluster members. Although suicide clusters are rare, evidence documenting the implementation of suicide cluster response activities in communities is required yet remains limited. In this study, we identified the core components of existing suicide cluster response frameworks through a search of the grey literature and conducted an international survey to assess the implementation of the core components by stakeholders with experience responding to a suicide cluster. The following six core components were identified from five cluster response frameworks and were incorporated into a survey assessing stakeholders’ experiences of responding to a suicide cluster: (1) Preparing for a suicide cluster; (2) Routine monitoring of suicide, suicide attempts, and cluster detection; (3) Coordination with the media and monitoring social media; (4) Identifying and supporting individuals at risk; (5) Promoting help-seeking and building community resilience; and (6) Long-term follow-up and evaluation. Twenty-six stakeholders completed the online survey. Many of the core components were implemented by stakeholders. However, gaps in practice were reported in terms of cluster surveillance, monitoring of referral uptake among bereaved individuals, and long-term evaluation. Barriers to implementation included the perceived availability and suitability of mental health services, and availability of long-term funding. Strategic policy and planning that addresses the practice-based experiences of communities has the potential to facilitate a more coordinated and timely response to suicide clusters.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole T. M. Hill & Jo Robinson, 2022. "Responding to Suicide Clusters in the Community: What Do Existing Suicide Cluster Response Frameworks Recommend and How Are They Implemented?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4444-:d:788811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4444/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/8/4444/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hill, Nicole & Too, Lay San & Spittal, Matt & Robinson, Jo, 2020. "Suicide clusters in Australian youth: A comparison of cluster detection methods," SocArXiv a6q3p, Center for Open Science.
    2. Jo Robinson & Katrina Witt & Michelle Lamblin & Matthew J. Spittal & Greg Carter & Karin Verspoor & Andrew Page & Gowri Rajaram & Vlada Rozova & Nicole T. M. Hill & Jane Pirkis & Caitlin Bleeker & Ale, 2020. "Development of a Self-Harm Monitoring System for Victoria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruth Benson & Jan Rigby & Christopher Brunsdon & Grace Cully & Lay San Too & Ella Arensman, 2022. "Quantitative Methods to Detect Suicide and Self-Harm Clusters: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Phillip Cheuk Fung Law & Lay San Too & Nicole T. M. Hill & Jo Robinson & Madelyn Gould & Jo-An Occhipinti & Matthew J. Spittal & Katrina Witt & Mark Sinyor & Benedikt Till & Nathaniel Osgood & Ante Pr, 2021. "A Pilot Case-Control Study of the Social Media Activity Following Cluster and Non-Cluster Suicides in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Emily Bebbington & Rob Poole & Sudeep Pradeep Kumar & Anne Krayer & Murali Krishna & Peter Taylor & Keith Hawton & Rajesh Raman & Mohan Kakola & Madhu Srinivasarangan & Catherine Robinson, 2023. "Establishing Self-Harm Registers: The Role of Process Mapping to Improve Quality of Surveillance Data Globally," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:8:p:4444-:d:788811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.