IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3567-d773225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Digital Transformation Promote the Rapid Recovery of Cities from the COVID-19 Epidemic? An Empirical Analysis from Chinese Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaojiao Liu

    (School of Journalism and Information Communication, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Non-Traditional Security Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shuai Liu

    (Non-Traditional Security Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Xiaolin Xu

    (Non-Traditional Security Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    College of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China)

  • Qi Zou

    (Non-Traditional Security Institute, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Background: Digital transformation has become a key intervention strategy for the global response to the COVID-19 epidemic, and digital technology is helping cities recover from the COVID-19 epidemic. However, the effects of urban digital transformation on the recovery from the COVID-19 epidemic still lack mechanism analyses and empirical testing. This study aimed to explain the theoretical mechanism of urban digital transformation on the recovery from the COVID-19 epidemic and to test its effectiveness using an empirical analysis. Methods: This study, using a theoretical and literature-based analysis, summarizes the impact mechanisms of urban digital transformation on the recovery of cities from the COVID-19 epidemic. A total of 83 large- and medium-sized cities from China are included in the empirical research sample, covering most major cities in China. The ordinary least squares (OLS) method is adopted to estimate the effect of China’s urban digitalization level on population attraction in the second quarter of 2020. Results: The theoretical analysis found that urban digital transformation improves the ability of cities to recover from the COVID-19 epidemic by promoting social communication, collaborative governance, and resilience. The main findings of the empirical analysis show that the digital level of a city has a significant positive effect on urban population attraction ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: A positive relationship was found between urban digital transformation and the rapid recovery of cities from the COVID-19 epidemic. Digital inventions for social communication, collaborative governance, and urban resilience are an effective way of fighting the COVID-19 emergency.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaojiao Liu & Shuai Liu & Xiaolin Xu & Qi Zou, 2022. "Can Digital Transformation Promote the Rapid Recovery of Cities from the COVID-19 Epidemic? An Empirical Analysis from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3567-:d:773225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3567/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3567/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chundakkadan, Radeef & Ravindran, Rekha, 2020. "Information flow and COVID-19 recovery," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    2. Boyeong Hong & Bartosz J. Bonczak & Arpit Gupta & Constantine E. Kontokosta, 2021. "Measuring inequality in community resilience to natural disasters using large-scale mobility data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. Renata Paola Dameri, 2017. "Erratum to: Smart City Implementation," Progress in IS, in: Smart City Implementation, pages E1-E1, Springer.
    4. Linda Hantrais & Paul Allin & Mihalis Kritikos & Melita Sogomonjan & Prathivadi B. Anand & Sonia Livingstone & Mark Williams & Martin Innes, 2021. "Covid-19 and the digital revolution," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 256-270, March.
    5. Renata Paola Dameri, 2017. "Smart City Implementation," Progress in IS, Springer, number 978-3-319-45766-6, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jihui Shi & Solomon Kwadwo Nyedu Danquah & Wanhao Dong, 2022. "A Novel Block Chain Method for Urban Digitization Governance in Birth Registration Field: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Chaohong Na & Xue Chen & Xiaojun Li & Yuting Li & Xiaolan Wang, 2022. "Digital Transformation of Value Chains and CSR Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    3. Guoen Xia & Zenghui Yu & Xuwu Peng, 2023. "How Does Enterprise Digital Transformation Affect Total Factor Productivity? Based on the Information Intermediary Role of Analysts’ Attention," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Lianghu Wang & Jun Shao, 2024. "Can Digitalization Improve the High-quality Development of Manufacturing? An Analysis Based on Chinese Provincial Panel Data," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 2010-2036, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ilja Nastjuk & Simon Trang & Elpiniki I. Papageorgiou, 2022. "Smart cities and smart governance models for future cities," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1917-1924, December.
    2. JungHoon Kim & Byungsun Yang, 2021. "A Smart City Service Business Model: Focusing on Transportation Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. KristIna BACULAKOVA, 2020. "Selected Aspects Of Smart City Concepts: Position Of Bratislava," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(3), pages 68-80, August.
    4. Mariusz Jedliński & Katarzyna Sosik-Filipiak, 2022. "The Role of Crosswalks in the Smart City Concept Implementation from the “iGen” Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdullah Almuqrin & Fawaz Alharbi & Majed Abusharhah, 2023. "How to Encourage Public Engagement in Smart City Development—Learning from Saudi Arabia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Kumar, Anand & Priya, Bhawna & Srivastava, Samir K., 2021. "Response to the COVID-19: Understanding implications of government lockdown policies," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 76-94.
    7. Sean Fox & Felix Agyemang & Laurence Hawker & Jeffrey Neal, 2024. "Integrating social vulnerability into high-resolution global flood risk mapping," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Lill Sarv & Ralf-Martin Soe, 2021. "Transition towards Smart City: The Case of Tallinn," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Anabel Ortega-Fernández & Rodrigo Martín-Rojas & Víctor Jesús García-Morales, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence in the Urban Environment: Smart Cities as Models for Developing Innovation and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-26, September.
    11. Renata Biadacz & Marek Biadacz, 2021. "Implementation of “Smart” Solutions and An Attempt to Measure Them: A Case Study of Czestochowa, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    12. Witold Chmielarz & Marek Zborowski & Alicja Fandrejewska & Mesut Atasever, 2021. "The Contribution of Socio-Cultural Aspects of Smartphone Applications to Smart City Creation. Poland–Turkey Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Zhou, Mingzhi & Zhou, Jiangping, 2024. "Multiscalar trip resilience and metro station-area characteristics: A case study of Hong Kong amid the pandemic," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    14. Davit ALAVERDYAN & Filip KUCERA & Martin HORAK, 2018. "Implementation Of The Smart City Concept In The Eu: Importance Of Cluster Initiatives And Best Practice Cases," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, Center for International Scientific Research of VSO and VSPP, vol. 6(1), pages 30-51, June.
    15. Francesco Schiavone & Francesco Paolo Appio & Luca Mora & Marcello Risitano, 2020. "The strategic, organizational, and entrepreneurial evolution of smart cities," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 1155-1165, December.
    16. Marina Everri & Mattia Messena & Finiki Nearchou & Laura Fruggeri, 2022. "Parent–Child Relationships, Digital Media Use and Parents’ Well-Being during COVID-19 Home Confinement: The Role of Family Resilience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-12, November.
    17. Justyna Żywiołek & Francesco Schiavone, 2021. "Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Dai, Peichao & Zhang, Shaoliang & Gong, Yunlong & Zhou, Yuan & Hou, Huping, 2022. "A crowd-sourced valuation of recreational ecosystem services using mobile signal data applied to a restored wetland in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    19. Chiara Garau & Valentina Maria Pavan, 2018. "Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Xinghua Feng & Chunliang Xiu & Jianxin Li & Yexi Zhong, 2021. "Measuring the Evolution of Urban Resilience Based on the Exposure–Connectedness–Potential (ECP) Approach: A Case Study of Shenyang City, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3567-:d:773225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.