IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3533-d772559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy Inference System for the Assessment of Indoor Air Quality in an Operating Room to Prevent Surgical Site Infection

Author

Listed:
  • Ylenia Colella

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Antonio Saverio Valente

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Lucia Rossano

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Teresa Angela Trunfio

    (Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Hospital of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Antonella Fiorillo

    (Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Hospital of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Giovanni Improta

    (Department of Public Health, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
    Interdepartmental Center for Research in Healthcare Management and Innovation in Healthcare (CIRMIS), University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

Indoor air quality in hospital operating rooms is of great concern for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). A wide range of relevant medical and engineering literature has shown that the reduction in air contamination can be achieved by introducing a more efficient set of controls of HVAC systems and exploiting alarms and monitoring systems that allow having a clear report of the internal air status level. In this paper, an operating room air quality monitoring system based on a fuzzy decision support system has been proposed in order to help hospital staff responsible to guarantee a safe environment. The goal of the work is to reduce the airborne contamination in order to optimize the surgical environment, thus preventing the occurrence of SSI and reducing the related mortality rate. The advantage of FIS is that the evaluation of the air quality is based on easy-to-find input data established on the best combination of parameters and level of alert. Compared to other literature works, the proposed approach based on the FIS has been designed to take into account also the movement of clinicians in the operating room in order to monitor unauthorized paths. The test of the proposed strategy has been executed by exploiting data collected by ad-hoc sensors placed inside a real operating block during the experimental activities of the “Bacterial Infections Post Surgery” Project (BIPS). Results show that the system is capable to return risk values with extreme precision.

Suggested Citation

  • Ylenia Colella & Antonio Saverio Valente & Lucia Rossano & Teresa Angela Trunfio & Antonella Fiorillo & Giovanni Improta, 2022. "A Fuzzy Inference System for the Assessment of Indoor Air Quality in an Operating Room to Prevent Surgical Site Infection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3533-:d:772559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3533/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3533/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martha Roselia Contreras-Valenzuela & Diego Seuret-Jiménez & Ana María Hdz-Jasso & Viridiana Aydeé León Hernández & Alma Nataly Abundes-Recilla & Eduardo Trutié-Carrero, 2022. "Design of a Fuzzy Logic Evaluation to Determine the Ergonomic Risk Level of Manual Material Handling Tasks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Arianna Scala & Ilaria Loperto & Maria Triassi & Giovanni Improta, 2022. "Risk Factors Analysis of Surgical Infection Using Artificial Intelligence: A Single Center Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-10, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3533-:d:772559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.