Author
Listed:
- Chanita Tantipoj
(Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)
- Thaksaporn Sirichanyaphong
(Mahidol International Dental School, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)
- Jiratchaya Nuntachurat
(Mahidol International Dental School, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)
- Kriddichon Ruetaijetjaroen
(Mahidol International Dental School, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)
- Narin Hiransuthikul
(Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand)
- Patr Pujarern
(Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)
- Pornpoj Fuangtharnthip
(Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)
- Siribang-on Piboonniyom Khovidhunkit
(Department of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400, Thailand)
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM), especially type 2 DM, has become a common problem worldwide. Previous studies have demonstrated that chairside screening can effectively identify undetected type 2 DM patients. This study was conducted to determine dentists’ attitudes toward DM screening in dental clinics. A total of 632 currently active dentists with more than 1 year of working experience participated. The six-part (importance, barriers, willingness, readiness, knowledge, and routine management) anonymous, self-administered questionnaire of five-point response scales was then distributed. The results illustrated that most dentists (86.3%) realized the importance of DM screening and that patients’ willingness was the main potential barrier (86.4%). Of the respondents, 98.1% and 82.4% were willing to measure blood pressure and weight and height for their patients, whereas only 45.4% and 38.8% were willing to collect blood from the fingertip or oral fluids for salivary diagnostics, respectively. Moreover, 73.7% of respondents were ready to refer patients to physicians, and 59.5% could explain the relationship between DM and oral diseases. However, only 44.3% and 27.9% were prepared to provide education about DM awareness or were able to perform screening, respectively. In addition, 67.2% and 65.8% knew the screening criteria and risk factors of DM, respectively, but only 45.1% knew what to do. The result of our study provided essential knowledge with respect to dentists’ attitudes in the screening for DM in Thai dental clinics.
Suggested Citation
Chanita Tantipoj & Thaksaporn Sirichanyaphong & Jiratchaya Nuntachurat & Kriddichon Ruetaijetjaroen & Narin Hiransuthikul & Patr Pujarern & Pornpoj Fuangtharnthip & Siribang-on Piboonniyom Khovidhunki, 2022.
"Dentists’ Attitudes toward Diabetes Mellitus Screening in Thai Dental Clinics,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-11, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3341-:d:769336
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Muneedej Suwattipong & Thitima Thuramonwong & Chanita Tantipoj & Pornpoj Fuangtharnthip & Supanee Thanakun & Weerapan Khovidhunkit & Siribang-on Piboonniyom Khovidhunkit, 2021.
"Comparison of Point-of-Care Testing and Hospital-Based Methods in Screening for Potential Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Abnormal Glucose Regulation in a Dental Setting,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-12, June.
- Manatsara Panakhup & Intouch Lertpanomwan & Chayaphat Pajonklaew & Tawepong Arayapisit & Suraphong Yuma & Patr Pujarern & Tharee Champirat & Naiyana Buranachad & Pornpoj Fuangtharnthip & Chanita Tanti, 2021.
"Attitude of Physicians towards Periodontal Disease and Diabetes Mellitus Screening in Dental Clinics in Thailand,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-11, May.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3341-:d:769336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.