IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3296-d768768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Experimental Analysis of Five Household Equipment-Based Methods for Decontamination and Reuse of Surgical Masks

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Scaglione

    (Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy
    Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione Industriale, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio, 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy
    CeSMA Centro Servizi Metrologici e Tecnologici Avanzati, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80146 Napoli, Italy)

  • Gianluigi De Falco

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione Industriale, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio, 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy
    CeSMA Centro Servizi Metrologici e Tecnologici Avanzati, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80146 Napoli, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Mantova

    (Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy
    CeSMA Centro Servizi Metrologici e Tecnologici Avanzati, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80146 Napoli, Italy)

  • Valeria Caturano

    (Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy
    CeSMA Centro Servizi Metrologici e Tecnologici Avanzati, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80146 Napoli, Italy)

  • Alessia Stornaiuolo

    (Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy
    Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione Industriale, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio, 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy
    CeSMA Centro Servizi Metrologici e Tecnologici Avanzati, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80146 Napoli, Italy)

  • Andrea D’Anna

    (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, dei Materiali e della Produzione Industriale, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio, 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy
    CeSMA Centro Servizi Metrologici e Tecnologici Avanzati, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80146 Napoli, Italy)

  • Paola Salvatore

    (Dipartimento di Medicina Molecolare e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy
    CeSMA Centro Servizi Metrologici e Tecnologici Avanzati, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80146 Napoli, Italy
    CEINGE, Biotecnologie Avanzate s.c.ar.l., Via G. Salvatore 436, 80131 Napoli, Italy
    Task Force on Microbiome Studies, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80131Napoli, Italy)

Abstract

The current coronavirus pandemic has increased worldwide consumption of individual protective devices. Single-use surgical masks are one of the most used devices to prevent the transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Nevertheless, the improper management of such protective equipment threatens our environment with a new form of plastic pollution. With the intention of contributing to a responsible policy of recycling, in the present work, five decontamination methods for used surgical masks that can be easily replicated with common household equipment are described. The decontamination procedures were hot water at 40 °C and 80 °C; autoclave; microwave at 750 W; and ultraviolet germicidal irradiation. After each decontamination procedure, the bacterial load reduction of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538 was recorded to verify the effectiveness of these methods and, moreover, bacterial filtration efficiency and breathability tests were performed to evaluate mask performances. The best results were obtained with the immersion in 80 °C water and the microwave-assisted sterilization. Both methods achieved a high degree of mask decontamination without altering the filtration efficiency and breathability, in accordance with the quality standard. The proposed decontamination methods represent a useful approach to reduce the environmental impact of this new waste material. Moreover, these procedures can be easily reproduced with common household equipment to increase the recycling efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Scaglione & Gianluigi De Falco & Giuseppe Mantova & Valeria Caturano & Alessia Stornaiuolo & Andrea D’Anna & Paola Salvatore, 2022. "An Experimental Analysis of Five Household Equipment-Based Methods for Decontamination and Reuse of Surgical Masks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3296-:d:768768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3296/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3296/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khaled Al-Hadyan & Ghazi Alsbeih & Ahmad Nobah & Jeffrey Lindstrom & Sawsan Falatah & Nawarh Faran & Salem Al-Ghamdi & Belal Moftah & Rashed Alhmaid, 2021. "In-House Filtration Efficiency Assessment of Vapor Hydrogen Peroxide Decontaminated Filtering Facepiece Respirators (FFRs)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, July.
    2. Thirumaaran Gopalan & Rabi’atul ‘Adawiyah Mohd Yatim & Mohd Ridha Muhamad & Nor Shafina Mohamed Nazari & N. Awanis Hashim & Jacob John & Victor Chee Wai Hoe, 2021. "Decontamination Methods of N95 Respirators Contaminated with SARS-CoV-2," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han Xiao & Cheng Ma & Hongwei Gao & Ye Gao & Yang Xue, 2022. "Green Transformation of Anti-Epidemic Supplies in the Post-Pandemic Era: An Evolutionary Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-26, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3296-:d:768768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.