IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p3111-d765393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19 Vaccination within the Context of Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 Vaccine Administered to Teachers in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Ganczak

    (Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Zielona Gora, 65-417 Zielona Gora, Poland)

  • Marcin Korzeń

    (Department of Methods of Artificial Intelligence and Applied Mathematics, West Pomeranian Institute of Technology, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland)

  • Ewa Sobieraj

    (Student Research Group, University of Zielona Gora, 65-417 Zielona Gora, Poland)

  • Jakub Goławski

    (Student Research Group, University of Zielona Gora, 65-417 Zielona Gora, Poland)

  • Oskar Pasek

    (Student Research Group, University of Zielona Gora, 65-417 Zielona Gora, Poland)

  • Daniel Biesiada

    (Primary Care Clinic “Lancet”, 73-240 Bierzwnik, Poland)

Abstract

In February 2021, Polish teachers were offered the ChAdOx1-S vaccine as a priority group. However, there have been concerns among educators regarding the efficacy of this vaccine, as compared to the other types of vaccines (e.g., mRNA). The objective of this study was to investigate the reactogenicity and the immunogenicity of this vaccine. Participants, specifically teachers, were invited for serological testing ≥ 4 weeks post-vaccination. Antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) were measured. Of the 192 participants, the mean age was 50.5 ± 8.3 years and the mean (range) dosing interval was 69.6 ± (25–111) days. Adverse reactions included feeling feverish (44.8%), headache (41.7%), malaise/chills (38.0%), and injection-site tenderness (37.5%); these were reported more frequently after the first dose (84.9%). Fewer males than females (54.8% vs. 80.1%) and fewer older participants (65.7% vs. 90.4%) reported side effects ( p < 0.002; p < 0.0001, respectively). All participants presented detectable anti-RBD IgG; the median (range) reading was 525.0 BAU/mL (20.6–5680.0); 1008.02 BAU/mL (115.3–5680.0) in those with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection; and 381.42 BAU/mL (20.6–3108.8) in those without ( p = 0.001). In 27.6%, the anti-RBD IgG level was >500 BAU/mL. A multivariate logistic regression revealed that previous infection and longer dose intervals were predictors of higher immunologic responses ( p < 0.0001; p = 0.01, respectively). The results demonstrated good tolerability and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1-S vaccine. Our study justified the longer dose interval to enhance a higher antibody response. Our findings may also support the prioritization of uninfected individuals in regions where COVID-19 vaccine-sparing strategies are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Ganczak & Marcin Korzeń & Ewa Sobieraj & Jakub Goławski & Oskar Pasek & Daniel Biesiada, 2022. "COVID-19 Vaccination within the Context of Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 Vaccine Administered to Teachers in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3111-:d:765393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/3111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/3111/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Ganczak & Paulina Dubiel & Marzena Drozd-Dąbrowska & Marcin Korzeń, 2022. "Does Vaccinating against Influenza in a Given Epidemic Season Have an Impact on Vaccination in the Next Season: A Follow-Up Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-11, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3111-:d:765393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.