IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p3033-d764425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness of Ultrasound Cardiovascular Images in Teaching Anatomy: A Pilot Study of an Eight-Hour Training Exposure

Author

Listed:
  • Mariam Haji-Hassan

    (Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Louis Pasteur Str., No. 6, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Tudor Călinici

    (Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Louis Pasteur Str., No. 6, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Tudor Drugan

    (Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Louis Pasteur Str., No. 6, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Sorana D. Bolboacă

    (Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Louis Pasteur Str., No. 6, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the students’ progress in evaluating ultrasound (US) and cadaveric cardiac images and long-time retention of information. First-year medical students were invited to participate in four two-hour online lectures during one week voluntarily. The students were trained to recognize cardiovascular anatomical structures on US and cadaveric images during the intervention. The participants’ abilities to identify specific anatomical structures were tested before, immediately after and six months after the training. A group of second-year students without US training participated as a control group and filled the same test once. Ninety-one first-year students agreed to participate, and forty-nine completed all three tests. The performances in the correct identification of cardiovascular structures on the US images significantly improved after the training but significantly decreased after six months. In the intervention group, the accurate identification of cardiovascular structures was significantly higher on cadaveric images (80% vs. 53%, p -value < 0.0001, n = 91 at post-training; 70% vs. 33%, p -value < 0.0001, n = 49 at 6 months after training). The correct answers percentage score in the control group varied from 6.7% to 66.7% for US cardiovascular anatomical without a significant difference than the intervention group ( p -value = 0.7651). First-year students’ knowledge of heart US anatomy proved less effective than cadaveric images, significantly improved after training and decreased over time, indicating the need for repetition reinforcement.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariam Haji-Hassan & Tudor Călinici & Tudor Drugan & Sorana D. Bolboacă, 2022. "Effectiveness of Ultrasound Cardiovascular Images in Teaching Anatomy: A Pilot Study of an Eight-Hour Training Exposure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-9, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3033-:d:764425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/3033/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/3033/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tracey L Weissgerber & Natasa M Milic & Stacey J Winham & Vesna D Garovic, 2015. "Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-10, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Theisen & Isabel Rada & Amélie Brau & Paul Gette & Romain Seil, 2016. "Muscle Activity Onset Prior to Landing in Patients after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Marten Postma & Joachim Goedhart, 2019. "PlotsOfData—A web app for visualizing data together with their summaries," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-8, March.
    3. Lotte Schoot & Evelien Heyselaar & Peter Hagoort & Katrien Segaert, 2016. "Does Syntactic Alignment Effectively Influence How Speakers Are Perceived by Their Conversation Partner?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Tracey L Weissgerber & Vesna D Garovic & Marko Savic & Stacey J Winham & Natasa M Milic, 2016. "From Static to Interactive: Transforming Data Visualization to Improve Transparency," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-8, June.
    5. Natasa Milic & Srdjan Masic & Vesna Bjegovic-Mikanovic & Goran Trajkovic & Jelena Marinkovic & Jelena Milin-Lazovic & Zoran Bukumiric & Marko Savic & Andja Cirkovic & Milan Gajic & Dejana Stanisavljev, 2018. "Blended learning is an effective strategy for acquiring competence in public health biostatistics," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(3), pages 421-428, April.
    6. Michael Greenacre, 2017. "Data reporting and visualization in ecology," Economics Working Papers 1558, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    7. Jesús Peral & Eduardo Gallego & David Gil & Mohan Tanniru & Prashant Khambekar, 2020. "Using Visualization to Build Transparency in a Healthcare Blockchain Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Tracey L Weissgerber, 2021. "Training early career researchers to use meta-research to improve science: A participant-guided “learn by doing” approach," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-5, February.
    9. Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan & Sarafoglou, Alexandra & Aarts, Sil Dr. & Albers, Casper J & Algermissen, Johannes & Bahník, Štěpán & van Dongen, Noah N'Djaye Nikolai & Hoekstra, Rink & Moreau, David & van Rav, 2021. "Toward More Transparency in Statistical Practice," MetaArXiv t93cg, Center for Open Science.
    10. Tracey L Weissgerber & Vesna D Garovic & Jelena S Milin-Lazovic & Stacey J Winham & Zoran Obradovic & Jerome P Trzeciakowski & Natasa M Milic, 2016. "Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
    11. Eric-Jan Wagenmakers & Alexandra Sarafoglou & Sil Aarts & Casper Albers & Johannes Algermissen & Štěpán Bahník & Noah Dongen & Rink Hoekstra & David Moreau & Don Ravenzwaaij & Aljaž Sluga & Franziska , 2021. "Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practice," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(11), pages 1473-1480, November.
    12. Joachim Goedhart, 2020. "PlotTwist: A web app for plotting and annotating continuous data," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-10, January.
    13. Opiła Janusz, 2019. "Role of Visualization in a Knowledge Transfer Process," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 164-179, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3033-:d:764425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.