Author
Listed:
- Anna Tenderenda
(Department of Geriatrics, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland)
- Monika Łysakowska
(Department of Microbiology and Medical Laboratory Immunology, Medical University of Lodz, 90-213 Lodz, Poland)
- Robert Dargiewicz
(Department of Physiotherapy, Academy of Medical Science in Bialystok, 15-875 Bialystok, Poland)
- Anna Gawron-Skarbek
(Department of Geriatrics, Medical University of Lodz, 90-647 Lodz, Poland)
Abstract
In the event of blood culture contamination (BCC), blood culture (BC) needs to be repeated. This may delay appropriate treatment, prolong hospitalization and, consequently, increase its costs. The aim of the study was to assess the frequency of BCC and associated factors in a general hospital in Poland based on reports of BC in samples submitted for laboratory testing in 2019–2020. BCC is recognized when bacteria (especially those belonging to natural human microbiota) are isolated from a single sample and no clinical signs indicated infection. True positive BC is confirmed by the growth of bacteria in more than one set of blood samples with the corresponding clinical signs present. The structure of BC sets, microorganisms, and laboratory costs of BCC were analyzed. Out of 2274 total BC cases, 11.5% were true positive BC and 9.5% were BCC. Of all the BCC identified in the entire hospital, 72% was from Internal Medicine (IM) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) combined. When single sets for BC were used in IM in 2020, the use increased to 85% compared with 2019 ( p < 0.05). The predominant isolates were coagulase-negative staphylococci (84%). The estimated extra laboratory costs of BCC exceeded EUR 268,000. The BCC was a more serious problem than expected, including non-recommended using of single BC sets. Compliance with the BC collection procedure should be increased in order to reduce BCC and thus extra hospital costs.
Suggested Citation
Anna Tenderenda & Monika Łysakowska & Robert Dargiewicz & Anna Gawron-Skarbek, 2022.
"Blood Culture Contamination: A Single General Hospital Experience of 2-Year Retrospective Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-14, March.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3009-:d:764300
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:3009-:d:764300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.