Author
Listed:
- Mattia Fragola
(Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)
- Augusto Arsieni
(Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) Brindisi, 72100 Brindisi, Italy)
- Nicola Carelli
(Agenzia Regionale per la Prevenzione e la Protezione dell’Ambiente (ARPA) Puglia, 70126 Bari, Italy)
- Sabrina Dattoli
(Agenzia Regionale per la Prevenzione e la Protezione dell’Ambiente (ARPA) Puglia, 70126 Bari, Italy)
- Sante Maiellaro
(Azienda Sanitaria Locale (ASL) Brindisi, 72100 Brindisi, Italy)
- Maria Rita Perrone
(Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)
- Salvatore Romano
(Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)
Abstract
Environmental samples collected in Brindisi (Italy) by a Hirst-type trap and in Lecce (Italy) by a PM10 sampler were analysed by optical microscopy and DNA-metabarcoding, respectively, to identify airborne pollen and perform an exploratory study, highlighting the benefits and limits of both sampling/detection systems. The Hirst-type trap/optical-microscopy system allowed detecting pollen on average over the full bloom season, since whole pollen grains, whose diameter vary within 10–100 μm, are required for morphological detection with optical microscopy. Conversely, pollen fragments with an aerodynamic diameter ≤10 μm were collected in Lecce by the PM10 sampler. Pollen grains and fragments are spread worldwide by wind/atmospheric turbulences and can age in the atmosphere, but aerial dispersal, aging, and long-range transport of pollen fragments are favoured over those of whole pollen grains because of their smaller size. Twenty-four Streptophyta families were detected in Lecce throughout the sampling year, but only nine out of them were in common with the 21 pollen families identified in Brindisi. Meteorological parameters and advection patterns were rather similar at both study sites, being only 37 km apart in a beeline, but their impact on the sample taxonomic structure was different, likely for the different pollen sampling/detection systems used in the two monitoring areas.
Suggested Citation
Mattia Fragola & Augusto Arsieni & Nicola Carelli & Sabrina Dattoli & Sante Maiellaro & Maria Rita Perrone & Salvatore Romano, 2022.
"Pollen Monitoring by Optical Microscopy and DNA Metabarcoding: Comparative Study and New Insights,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-25, February.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2624-:d:757485
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2624-:d:757485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.