IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2577-d756517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of the COVID-19 Pandemic among Women with Infertility: Correlations with Dispositional Optimism

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda J. Dillard

    (Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, USA)

  • Ava E. Weber

    (Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, USA)

  • Amanda Chassee

    (Reproductive Genomics Program, The Fertility Center, Grand Rapids, MI 49525, USA)

  • Mili Thakur

    (Reproductive Genomics Program, The Fertility Center, Grand Rapids, MI 49525, USA
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA
    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, Spectrum Health Medical Group, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA)

Abstract

People who are more optimistic may experience better psychological health during stressful times. The present study examined the perceptions and emotions surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic among American women who were experiencing fertility problems. We tested if dispositional optimism in these women was associated with less negative perceptions and emotions. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients from a single private infertility and reproductive clinic in an urban area in the Midwest, United States. Women, age 18 or older, primarily White and educated, who presented for an appointment to the clinic were invited to participate in an email-based survey. Respondents ( N = 304) reported their perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on fertility treatment, emotions associated with this impact, and perceived stress and depressive symptoms. They also completed measures of dispositional optimism and expectations for a future pregnancy. Findings indicated that women perceived an overall negative impact of the pandemic on their treatment plans, which was associated with more negative emotions, lower expectations of future pregnancy, and greater stress and depressive symptoms during the pandemic. However, further correlational analyses revealed that being higher in trait optimism was associated with perceiving a less negative impact of the pandemic, experiencing fewer negative emotions, and less overall stress and depressive symptoms. Although women with fertility problems have perceived the pandemic as negative and disruptive, those who are higher in optimism may be less affected.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda J. Dillard & Ava E. Weber & Amanda Chassee & Mili Thakur, 2022. "Perceptions of the COVID-19 Pandemic among Women with Infertility: Correlations with Dispositional Optimism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2577-:d:756517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2577/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2577/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ewa Rzońca & Grażyna Iwanowicz-Palus & Agnieszka Bień & Artur Wdowiak & Ryszard Szymański & Gustaw Chołubek, 2018. "Generalized Self-Efficacy, Dispositional Optimism, and Illness Acceptance in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-10, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Artur Wdowiak & Agnieszka Anusiewicz & Grzegorz Bakalczuk & Dorota Raczkiewicz & Paula Janczyk & Marta Makara-Studzińska, 2021. "Assessment of Quality of Life in Infertility Treated Women in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Inés Morán-Sánchez & Evdochia Adoamnei & María L. Sánchez-Ferrer & María T. Prieto-Sánchez & Julián J. Arense-Gonzalo & Ana Carmona-Barnosi & Ana I. Hernandez-Peñalver & Jaime Mendiola & Alberto M. To, 2021. "Assessment of Optimism in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Case Control-Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-8, February.
    3. Beata Hornik & Jan Duława, 2019. "Frailty, Quality of Life, Anxiety, and Other Factors Affecting Adherence to Physical Activity Recommendations by Hemodialysis Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Grażyna Iwanowicz-Palus & Marta Zarajczyk & Agnieszka Bień & Magdalena Korżyńska-Piętas & Justyna Krysa & Mansur Rahnama-Hezavah & Artur Wdowiak, 2021. "The Relationship between Social Support, Self-Efficacy and Characteristics of Women with Diabetes during Pregnancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2577-:d:756517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.