IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1903-d744557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Electromyographic Analysis of Romanian, Step-Romanian, and Stiff-Leg Deadlift: Implication for Resistance Training

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Coratella

    (Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Giuseppe Colombo 71, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Gianpaolo Tornatore

    (Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Giuseppe Colombo 71, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Stefano Longo

    (Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Giuseppe Colombo 71, 20133 Milano, Italy)

  • Fabio Esposito

    (Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Giuseppe Colombo 71, 20133 Milano, Italy
    IRCSS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, 20122 Milano, Italy)

  • Emiliano Cè

    (Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Giuseppe Colombo 71, 20133 Milano, Italy
    IRCSS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, 20122 Milano, Italy)

Abstract

The present study examined the posterior chain muscle excitation in different deadlift variations. Ten competitive bodybuilders (training seniority of 10.6 ± 1.8 years) performed the Romanian (RD), Romanian standing on a step (step-RD), and stiff-leg deadlift (SD) with an 80% 1-RM. The excitation of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, biceps femoris, semitendinosus, erector spinae longissimus, and iliocostalis was assessed during both the ascending and descending phases. During the ascending phase, the RMS of the gluteus maximus was greater in the step-RD than in the RD (effect size (ES): 1.70, 0.55/2.84) and SD (ES: 1.18, 0.11/2.24). Moreover, a greater RMS was found in the SD than in the RD (ES: 0.99, 0.04/1.95). The RMS of the semitendinosus was greater in the step-RD than in the RD (ES: 0.82, 0.20/1.44) and SD (ES: 3.13, 1.67/4.59). Moreover, a greater RMS was found in the RD than in the SD (ES: 1.38, 0.29/2.48). The RMS of the longissimus was greater in the step-RD than in the RD (ES: 2.12, 0.89/3.34) and SD (ES: 3.28, 1.78/4.78). The descending phase had fewer differences between the exercises. No further differences between the exercises were found. The step-RD increased the overall excitation of the posterior chain muscles, possibly because of the greater range of movement and posterior muscle elongation during the anterior flexion. Moreover, the RD appeared to target the semitendinosus more than the SD, while the latter excited the gluteus maximus more.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Coratella & Gianpaolo Tornatore & Stefano Longo & Fabio Esposito & Emiliano Cè, 2022. "An Electromyographic Analysis of Romanian, Step-Romanian, and Stiff-Leg Deadlift: Implication for Resistance Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1903-:d:744557
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1903/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1903/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuseppe Coratella & Gianpaolo Tornatore & Francesca Caccavale & Stefano Longo & Fabio Esposito & Emiliano Cè, 2021. "The Activation of Gluteal, Thigh, and Lower Back Muscles in Different Squat Variations Performed by Competitive Bodybuilders: Implications for Resistance Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Giuseppe Coratella & Gianpaolo Tornatore & Stefano Longo & Fabio Esposito & Emiliano Cè, 2020. "An Electromyographic Analysis of Lateral Raise Variations and Frontal Raise in Competitive Bodybuilders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-12, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giuseppe Coratella & Gianpaolo Tornatore & Francesca Caccavale & Stefano Longo & Fabio Esposito & Emiliano Cè, 2021. "The Activation of Gluteal, Thigh, and Lower Back Muscles in Different Squat Variations Performed by Competitive Bodybuilders: Implications for Resistance Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Catarina N. Matias & Stefania Toselli & Cristina P. Monteiro & Francesco Campa, 2022. "Editorial: New Training Strategies and Evaluation Methods for Improving Health and Physical Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-4, May.
    3. Berkant Erman & Mehmet Zeki Ozkol & Jelena Ivanović & Hakan Arslan & Marko Ćosić & Yasin Yuzbasioglu & Milivoj Dopsaj & Tolga Aksit, 2021. "Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1903-:d:744557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.