IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1829-d743037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dual Use of Public and Private Health Care Services in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Silva

    (Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, BE-9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Niel Hens

    (Data Science Institute (DSI), I-BioStat, Hasselt University, BE-3500 Hasselt, Belgium)

  • Gustavo Gusso

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, Brazil)

  • Susan Lagaert

    (Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, BE-9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • James Macinko

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health，University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Sara Willems

    (Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, BE-9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

(1) Background: Brazil has a universal public healthcare system, but individuals can still opt to buy private health insurance and/or pay out-of-pocket for healthcare. Past research suggests that Brazilians make combined use of public and private services, possibly causing double costs. This study aims to describe this dual use and assess its relationship with socioeconomic status (SES). (2) Methods: We calculated survey-weighted population estimates and descriptive statistics, and built a survey-weighted logistic regression model to explore the effect of SES on dual use of healthcare, including demographic characteristics and other variables related to healthcare need and use as additional explanatory variables using data from the 2019 Brazilian National Health Survey. (3) Results: An estimated 39,039,016 ( n = 46,914; 18.6%) persons sought care in the two weeks before the survey, of which 5,576,216 were dual users ( n = 6484; 14.7%). Dual use happened both in the direction of public to private ( n = 4628; 67.3%), and of private to public ( n = 1855; 32.7%). Higher income had a significant effect on dual use ( p < 0.0001), suggesting a dose–response relationship, even after controlling for confounders. Significant effects were also found for region ( p < 0.0001) and usual source of care (USC) ( p < 0.0001). (4) Conclusion: A large number of Brazilians are seeking care from a source different than their regular system. Higher SES, region, and USC are associated factors, possibly leading to more health inequity. Due to its high prevalence and important implications, more research is warranted to illuminate the main causes of dual use.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Silva & Niel Hens & Gustavo Gusso & Susan Lagaert & James Macinko & Sara Willems, 2022. "Dual Use of Public and Private Health Care Services in Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1829-:d:743037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanjay Basu & Jason Andrews & Sandeep Kishore & Rajesh Panjabi & David Stuckler, 2012. "Comparative Performance of Private and Public Healthcare Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Macinko, James & Seixas, Brayan V. & de Oliveira, Cesar & Lima-Costa, Maria Fernanda, 2022. "Private health insurance, healthcare spending and utilization among older adults: Results from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 23(C).
    2. Stefan Sliwa Ruiz & Malte Becker & Thomas Hone & Rudi Rocha, 2023. "Doctor Turnover and Health Outcomes: Evidence from the Exit of Cuban Doctors in Brazil," Working Papers 18, Instituto de Estudos para Políticas de Saúde.
    3. Lucas Akio Iza Trindade & Jaqueline Lopes Pereira & Jean Michel Rocha Sampaio Leite & Marcelo Macedo Rogero & Regina Mara Fisberg & Flavia Mori Sarti, 2024. "Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Associated with Impoverishment Due to Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure in São Paulo City, Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Akpan & Surajudeen Abiola Abdulrahman & Nne Pepple, 2020. "Comparison of the Level of Adherence to Laboratory Quality Management System between Public and Private Secondary Health Facilities in Southern Nigeria," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(12), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Tafesse, Wiktoria & Chalkley, Martin, 2021. "Faith-based provision of sexual and reproductive healthcare in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    3. Harmeet Kaur Kang & Bandana Bisht & Manmeet Kaur & Obrey Alexis & Aaron Worsley & Denny John, 2024. "Effectiveness of interpersonal psychotherapy in comparison to other psychological and pharmacological interventions for reducing depressive symptoms in women diagnosed with postpartum depression in lo," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    4. Choi, Jaerim & Lim, Sunghun, 2023. "Ostrom Meets the Pandemic: Lessons from Asian Rice Farming Traditions," 97th Annual Conference, March 27-29, 2023, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 334543, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    5. Zoe Dettrick & Hebe N Gouda & Andrew Hodge & Eliana Jimenez-Soto, 2016. "Measuring Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in Developing Countries Using Demographic and Health Surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    6. Titeca, Hannes, 2016. "Healthcare Spending: The Role of Healthcare Institutions from an International Perspective," MPRA Paper 73678, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Beaussier, Anne-Laure & Demeritt, David & Griffiths, Alex & Rothstein, Henry, 2020. "Steering by their own lights: Why regulators across Europe use different indicators to measure healthcare quality," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(5), pages 501-510.
    8. Sulakshana Nandi & Helen Schneider & Priyanka Dixit, 2017. "Hospital utilization and out of pocket expenditure in public and private sectors under the universal government health insurance scheme in Chhattisgarh State, India: Lessons for universal health cover," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Juliet Mwanga-Amumpaire & Tobias Alfvén & Celestino Obua & Karin Källander & Richard Migisha & Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg & Grace Ndeezi & Joan Nakayaga Kalyango, 2021. "Appropriateness of Care for Common Childhood Infections at Low-Level Private Health Facilities in a Rural District in Western Uganda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Sujha Subramanian & Robai Gakunga & Joseph Kibachio & Gladwell Gathecha & Patrick Edwards & Elijah Ogola & Gerald Yonga & Naftali Busakhala & Esther Munyoro & Jeremiah Chakaya & Nancy Ngugi & Nyawira , 2018. "Cost and affordability of non-communicable disease screening, diagnosis and treatment in Kenya: Patient payments in the private and public sectors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Iasmina Petrovici & Mihaela Ionica & Octavian C. Neagoe, 2021. "Economic Crisis: A Factor for the Delayed Diagnosis of Breast Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-10, April.
    12. Marson, Marta & Migheli, Matteo & Saccone, Donatella, 2023. "Free to die: Economic freedoms and influenza mortality," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    13. Shelli Israelsen & Andrea Malji, 2021. "COVID-19 in India: A Comparative Analysis of the Kerala and Gujarat Development Models’ Initial Responses," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 21(4), pages 397-418, October.
    14. Zachary Wagner & Somalee Banerjee & Manoj Mohanan & Neeraj Sood, 2023. "Does the market reward quality? Evidence from India," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 467-505, September.
    15. Kiplagat, Isabella & Mugo, Mercy & Oleche, Martine O., 2021. "Provider Process Quality of Healthcare and its Determinants in Kenya," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 9(4), September.
    16. Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme & Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua & Passador, João Luiz, 2022. "On the choice of public or private management models in the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Idrissa Beogo & Chieh-Yu Liu & Yiing-Jenq Chou & Chuan-Yu Chen & Nicole Huang, 2014. "Health-Care-Seeking Patterns in the Emerging Private Sector in Burkina Faso: A Population-Based Study of Urban Adult Residents in Ouagadougou," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-11, May.
    18. Jaqueline Hansen & Antonia Reinecke & Hans-Jörg Schmerer, 2021. "Health Expenditures and the Effectiveness of Covid-19 Prevention in International Comparison," CESifo Working Paper Series 9069, CESifo.
    19. Smithers, Daniel & Waitzkin, Howard, 2022. "Universal health coverage as hegemonic health policy in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    20. Raut, Nirmal Kumar & Tanaka, Ryuichi, 2021. "Monitoring health services delivery: Evidence from civil conflict in Nepal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1829-:d:743037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.