IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1741-d741388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Jakub Pietrzak

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska

    (Department of Anesthesiology Nursing & Intensive Care, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Lucyna Tomaszek

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, 30-705 Krakow, Poland
    Director of Nursing Band, National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, 34-700 Rabka-Zdrój, Poland)

  • Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska

    (Department of Gynecology, Gynecological Oncology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

Abstract

Introduction: Pain experienced during labor is a symptom of contractile activity and is a physiological feature of the uterus that occurs at the appropriate stages of labor. For the majority of women, labor pain is the most severe pain they will ever experience, and therefore should be relieved. Objective: (1) To evaluate labor pain intensity before and after using non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions; (2) to assess women’s satisfaction of labor pain management. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional survey study was performed on 500 women who gave birth in different reference level hospitals (i.e., I, II, III). Pain intensity was assessed according the Numeric Rating Scale (range 0–10), whereas women’s satisfaction was measured with a 5 point Likert scale. Results: The use of both non-pharmacological (median 6.7 (5; 8) vs. 4.5 (3.3; 5.5)) and pharmacological methods (median 8 (7; 9) vs. 5 (3; 6)) resulted in a significant reduction in pain ( p < 0.01). Water immersion and epidural anesthesia proved to be the most effective non-pharmacological and pharmacological methods, respectively. In hospitals of reference I, analgesic management was based primarily on the use of non-pharmacological techniques, less often mixed, i.e., non-pharmacological and pharmacological techniques (27.5%). On the other hand, in hospitals with higher referentiality, mixed methods were used more often (level II—65.8%; level III—81.2%). Pain intensity was significantly higher ( p < 0.0001) in hospitals with reference level I (median 5 (4; 6)) than in the hospitals with reference level II (median 4.2 (3; 5)) or level III (median 4.2 (3.3; 5.4)). Epidural anesthesia was most often performed (60%) in the hospital of reference II. Women’s satisfaction (median 4 (3; 5)), inter alia, was associated with the effectiveness of applied methods. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that women giving birth in hospitals of higher referentiality have better control of labor pain due to access to pharmacological methods. Epidural anesthesia remains the gold standard for relieving labor pain. The choice of a specific method is determined by the degree of hospital and associated with the pain referentiality.

Suggested Citation

  • Jakub Pietrzak & Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska & Lucyna Tomaszek & Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska, 2022. "A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1741-:d:741388
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1741/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1741/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iwona Czech & Piotr Fuchs & Anna Fuchs & Miłosz Lorek & Dominika Tobolska-Lorek & Agnieszka Drosdzol-Cop & Jerzy Sikora, 2018. "Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Methods of Labour Pain Relief—Establishment of Effectiveness and Comparison," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy Rose Hunter & Annie Heiderscheit & Megan Galbally & Davide Gravina & Hiba Mutwalli & Hubertus Himmerich, 2023. "The Effects of Music-Based Interventions for Pain and Anxiety Management during Vaginal Labour and Caesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Randomised Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(23), pages 1-26, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1741-:d:741388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.