IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1646-d739747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personality Traits, Strategies of Coping with Stress and Psychophysical Wellbeing of Surgical and Non-Surgical Doctors in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Ewa Marcisz-Dyla

    (Faculty of Management, Psychology, Katowice Business University, 40-659 Katowice, Poland)

  • Józefa Dąbek

    (Department of Cardiology, School of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, Poland)

  • Tomasz Irzyniec

    (Department of Health Promotion and Community Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, ul. Medyków 12, 40-752 Katowice, Poland)

  • Czesław Marcisz

    (Department of Gerontology and Geriatric Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the personality traits, strategies of coping with stress and psychophysical wellbeing of surgical and non-surgical Polish doctors. The study used the following questionnaires and scales: the Resiliency Assessment Scale, the Type D Personality Scale, the Framingham Type A Scale, the Mini COPE—Coping Inventory and the Wellbeing Scale. Doctors performing surgical specialties were characterized by a significantly higher level of resilience components, a more frequent occurrence of the type B behaviour pattern and less frequent type D personality than doctors performing non-surgical specializations. The Mini COPE point values were comparable between surgical and non-surgical physicians. The sense of psychological wellbeing was higher in surgical specialists. The higher the values of the Optimistic approach to life and the ability to mobilize oneself in difficult situations, the lower the values of the Turning to religion domain and the higher the values of the Denial domain correlated with the performance of surgical specialization. Men performing surgical specializations were more often optimistic and inclined to consume alcohol, while women with non-surgical specialization more often coped with stress by turning to religion. We conclude that the personality traits of Polish doctors vary depending on their specialization. Physicians’ coping strategies do not differ depending on their specialization. The sense of mental wellbeing is higher in surgical specialists compared to non-surgical specialists. An optimistic approach to life and the ability to mobilize oneself in difficult situations, as well as coping with stress by denial are associated with the surgical specialization. Men performing surgical specialties more often declare optimism and a tendency to cope with stress by consuming alcohol or psychoactive substances, while women who perform non-surgical specializations more often cope with stress by turning to religion. Psychological screening tests and appropriate training, taking into account medical specialization, could be one way of improving resilience and coping with stress among doctors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewa Marcisz-Dyla & Józefa Dąbek & Tomasz Irzyniec & Czesław Marcisz, 2022. "Personality Traits, Strategies of Coping with Stress and Psychophysical Wellbeing of Surgical and Non-Surgical Doctors in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1646-:d:739747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luciano Garcia Lourenção & Bruno Martinez Rigino & Natalia Sperli Geraldes Marin dos Santos Sasaki & Maria Jaqueline Coelho Pinto & Francisco Rosemiro Guimarães Ximenes Neto & Flávio Adriano Borges & , 2022. "Analysis of the Coping Strategies of Primary Health Care Professionals: Cross-Sectional Study in a Large Brazilian Municipality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1646-:d:739747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.