IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1210-d730792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stabilization of Zinc in Agricultural Soil Originated from Commercial Organic Fertilizer by Natural Zeolite

Author

Listed:
  • Lijuan Sun

    (ECO—Environment Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Rightway Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200131, China)

  • Shuangxi Li

    (ECO—Environment Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Peiyun Gong

    (ECO—Environment Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China)

  • Ke Song

    (ECO—Environment Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China)

  • Hong Zhang

    (ECO—Environment Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China)

  • Yafei Sun

    (ECO—Environment Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China)

  • Qin Qin

    (ECO—Environment Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China)

  • Bin Zhou

    (ECO—Environment Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China)

  • Yong Xue

    (ECO—Environment Protection Research Institute, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Environmental Protection Monitoring Station of Agriculture, Shanghai 201403, China
    Shanghai Key Laboratory of Protected Horticultural Technology, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201403, China)

Abstract

Exploring ways to reduce the risk of heavy metal pollution by organic fertilizer application is of vital importance. In the present study, by conducting a pot experiment, natural zeolite was applied together with pig manure based organic fertilizer to agricultural soil in order to test its possibility of reducing the risk of heavy metals originating from pig manure. The results showed that a low rate of organic fertilizer (10%) application increased the biomass of Chinese cabbage (by 57.2%), while a high rate of organic fertilizer (30%) decreased the biomass of Chinese cabbage (by 46.16%), and meanwhile a 3% zeolite addition increased the biomass of Chinese cabbage which was treated with 30% organic fertilizer. The organic fertilizer addition decreased soil pH and increased soil CEC, while zeolite addition increased soil pH and decreased the soil organic matter content. The concentration of Zn in Chinese cabbage shoots increased with the organic fertilizer addition from 4.46% to 48.27%, while the addition of 1% and 3% zeolite significantly decreased Zn in Chinese cabbage shoots by 15.53% and 14.08%, respectively. The concentration of DPTA-extractable and DGT-extractable Zn of soil was increased by organic fertilizer application, whereas zeolite addition decreased the concentration of DPTA-extractable and DGT-extractable Zn in soil treated with organic fertilizer. Our present study suggests that natural zeolite application could be a promising method to reduce the risk of heavy metals originating from organic fertilizers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijuan Sun & Shuangxi Li & Peiyun Gong & Ke Song & Hong Zhang & Yafei Sun & Qin Qin & Bin Zhou & Yong Xue, 2022. "Stabilization of Zinc in Agricultural Soil Originated from Commercial Organic Fertilizer by Natural Zeolite," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1210-:d:730792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1210/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1210/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guoxin Wu & Haoqi Wang & Mengqi Duan & Licuo Ze & Shixiong Dong & Huimin Zhang & Kejun Wang & Zhankun Tan & Peng Shang, 2024. "Impact of Grazing Tibetan Pigs on Soil Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1210-:d:730792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.