IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1141-d729345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes in Viewer Engagement and Accessibility of Popular Vaping Videos on TikTok: A 12-Month Prospective Study

Author

Listed:
  • Brienna N. Rutherford

    (National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia)

  • Tianze Sun

    (National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia)

  • Carmen C. W. Lim

    (National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia)

  • Jack Chung

    (National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia)

  • Brandon Cheng

    (National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia)

  • Lily Davidson

    (School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia)

  • Calvert Tisdale

    (School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia)

  • Janni Leung

    (National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2033, Australia)

  • Daniel Stjepanović

    (National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia)

  • Jason P. Connor

    (National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    Discipline of Psychiatry, The University of Queensland, Herston 4006, Australia)

  • Gary C. K. Chan

    (National Centre for Youth Substance Use Research, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia
    School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia 4067, Australia)

Abstract

Aim: There are concerns regarding what young people are exposed to on TikTok due to trending content promoting e-cigarette use through humour, marketing and lifestyle acceptability. Using baseline data from November 2020, we aimed to examine how much content from a sample of popular vaping videos remained accessible at 9- and 12-month follow-ups. We aimed to monitor changes in viewer engagement (using metadata) before and after the U.S. Congressional Hearing on youth protection measures on social media in October 2021. Methods: Hashtag-based keywords were used to collect the most viewed publicly available e-cigarette related videos on TikTok (N = 802) from inception to November 2020 to form a baseline. Researchers conducted a longitudinal descriptive study using this data, with 9- and 12-month follow-ups to measure changes in viewer engagement (using metadata) and content availability. Findings: Of the 802 videos from the baseline, 562 remained at the 9-month follow-up and 511 remained at the 12-month follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up, the majority of vaping-related hashtags were removed by TikTok after the Congressional Hearing. Between the baseline and 9-month follow up, views increased by 1.4% and likes increased by 4.4%. At 12-month follow-up, views had increased by 1.7% and likes by 4.2% compared to baseline data. Whilst 291 videos were no longer publicly accessible at 12-month follow-up, 39 of these were made inaccessible by the content creators. The most viewed and most liked vaping videos at baseline were still publicly available. Conclusions: Whilst the depiction type and thematic distribution of removed videos suggest that TikTok may be removing a small proportion of content that promotes the use of e-cigarettes, metadata of remaining videos indicate an increase in viewer engagement. TikTok’s removal of explicit substance-related hashtags from the platform could be a step towards preventing adolescents from being exposed to harmful behaviours and substances online. However, the platform should consider enforcing effective age restrictions on content that promotes substance use in a positive light.

Suggested Citation

  • Brienna N. Rutherford & Tianze Sun & Carmen C. W. Lim & Jack Chung & Brandon Cheng & Lily Davidson & Calvert Tisdale & Janni Leung & Daniel Stjepanović & Jason P. Connor & Gary C. K. Chan, 2022. "Changes in Viewer Engagement and Accessibility of Popular Vaping Videos on TikTok: A 12-Month Prospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1141-:d:729345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1141/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1141/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonine Jancey & Tama Leaver & Katharina Wolf & Becky Freeman & Kevin Chai & Stella Bialous & Marilyn Bromberg & Phoebe Adams & Meghan Mcleod & Renee N. Carey & Kahlia McCausland, 2023. "Promotion of E-Cigarettes on TikTok and Regulatory Considerations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-10, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1141-:d:729345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.