IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p963-d725593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Moderation of Perceived Comfort and Relations with Patients in the Relationship between Secure Workplace Attachment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Elderly Facilities Staff

Author

Listed:
  • Marcello Nonnis

    (Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Alessandro Lorenzo Mura

    (Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Scrima

    (Department of Psychology, Université de Rouen Normandie, 76130 Mont-Saint-Aignan, France)

  • Stefania Cuccu

    (Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Ferdinando Fornara

    (Department of Pedagogy, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

Abstract

This study focuses on caregivers who work in residential facilities (RFs) for the elderly, and specifically on their organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) in relation to their interaction respectively with the overall context (workplace attachment dimension), the spatial-physical environment (perceived environmental comfort), and the social environment (relationship with patients). A sample of health care workers (medical or health care specialists, nurses, and office employees, n = 129) compiled a self-report paper-pencil questionnaire, which included scales measuring the study variables. The research hypotheses included secure workplace attachment style as independent variable, OCBs as the dependent variable, and perceived comfort and relations with patients as moderators. Results showed that both secure workplace attachment and perceived comfort promote OCBs, but the latter counts especially as a compensation of an insecure workplace attachment. As expected, difficult relationships with patients hinder the relationship between secure workplace attachment style and OCBs. In sum, our study highlights the importance of the joint consideration of the psychological, social, and environmental dimensions for fostering positive behaviors in caregivers employed in elderly care settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcello Nonnis & Alessandro Lorenzo Mura & Fabrizio Scrima & Stefania Cuccu & Ferdinando Fornara, 2022. "The Moderation of Perceived Comfort and Relations with Patients in the Relationship between Secure Workplace Attachment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in Elderly Facilities Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:963-:d:725593
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/963/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/963/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mealem, Yosef & Siniver, Erez & Yaniv, Gideon, 2012. "Patient compliance, physician empathy and financial incentives within a principal-agent framework," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 827-830.
    2. Reena Devi & Graham Martin & Jay Banerjee & Louise Butler & Tim Pattison & Lesley Cruickshank & Caroline Maries-Tillott & Tracie Wilson & Sarah Damery & Julienne Meyer & Antonius Poot & Peter Chamberl, 2020. "Improving the Quality of Care in Care Homes Using the Quality Improvement Collaborative Approach: Lessons Learnt from Six Projects Conducted in the UK and The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Javier López & Gema Pérez-Rojo & Cristina Noriega & Cristina Velasco, 2021. "Personal and Work-Related Factors Associated with Good Care for Institutionalized Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Lorenzo Mura & Silvia Ariccio & Teresa Villani & Flavia Bonaiuto & Marino Bonaiuto, 2023. "The Physical Environment in Remote Working: Development and Validation of Perceived Remote Workplace Environment Quality Indicators (PRWEQIs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reena Devi & Adam Gordon & Tom Dening, 2022. "Enhancing the Quality of Care in Long-Term Care Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-3, January.
    2. Sarah Damery & Sarah Flanagan & Janet Jones & Kate Jolly, 2021. "The Effect of Providing Staff Training and Enhanced Support to Care Homes on Care Processes, Safety Climate and Avoidable Harms: Evaluation of a Care Home Quality Improvement Programme in England," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Ryuichi Ohta & Yoshinori Ryu & Takuji Katsube & Chiaki Sano, 2020. "Rural Homecare Nurses’ Challenges in Providing Seamless Patient Care in Rural Japan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Everink, Irma & Urlings, Judith & Griffiths, Alys & Verbeek, Hilde & Haunch, Kirsty & Spilsbury, Karen & Hamers, Jan & Devi, Reena, 2023. "Bridging the gap between science and care: a qualitative exploration of the role of the Scientific Linking Pin researcher working in research and practice partnerships," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120712, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Anna Dadswell & Ceri Wilson & Hilary Bungay, 2024. "Sustainable Creative Practice with Older People: A Collaborative Approach between Arts and Care Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:963-:d:725593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.