IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p875-d723922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Burden of Oral Cancer on the 10 Most Populous Countries from 1990 to 2019: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Shu-Zhen Zhang

    (The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, 237 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Long Xie

    (The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, 237 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zheng-Jun Shang

    (The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China
    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, 237 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Background: Oral cancer (OC) is a common tumour that poses a threat to human health and imposes a heavy burden on countries. This study assessed the burden imposed by OC on the 10 most populous countries from 1990 to 2019 on the basis of gender, age and socio-demographic index. Methods: Data on incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years (DALY) and corresponding age-standardised rates (ASR) for OC in the 10 most populous countries from 1990 to 2019 were derived from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Estimated annual percentage changes were calculated to assess the trends of morbidity, mortality and DALY. The indicator that served as a proxy for survival rate was the supplement of mortality-to-incidence ratio (SMIR) (1 − (M/I)). Results: The number of new cases, deaths and DALY have increased in all 10 countries in the past 30 years. Trends in age-standardised incidence rates (ASIR), age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) and age-standardised DALY for OC in the 10 most populous countries varied. The SMIR increased in all countries, with most countries having an SMIR between 30% and 50%. In 2019, the United States had the highest SMIR at 76%, whereas Russia had the lowest at 21.7%. Incidence and mortality were close between male and female subjects in Japan, Indonesia, Mexico, India, Bangladesh and Pakistan. The incidence and mortality in male subjects in the United States, Russia, China and Brazil were two or more times those of female subjects. Gender difference was highest among patients aged 40–69 years. Conclusion: Trends and gender differences in ASIR, ASMR and age-standardised DALY for OC vary in the 10 most populous countries. Government cancer programs are often expensive to run, especially in countries with large populations. Policy makers need to take these differences into account when formulating policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shu-Zhen Zhang & Long Xie & Zheng-Jun Shang, 2022. "Burden of Oral Cancer on the 10 Most Populous Countries from 1990 to 2019: Estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:875-:d:723922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/875/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/875/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Health Organization, 2019. "WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic 2019: Offer help to quit tobacco use," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt1g16k8b9, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Neufeld & Carina Ferreira-Borges & Jürgen Rehm, 2020. "Implementing Health Warnings on Alcoholic Beverages: On the Leading Role of Countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Ronchetti, Jérôme & Terriau, Anthony, 2021. "Help me quit smoking but don't make me sick! The controversial effects of electronic cigarettes on tobacco smokers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    3. Daniel Tzu-Hsuan Chen & Christina N. Kyriakos, 2021. "Cigarette and E-Cigarettes Dual Users, Exclusive Users and COVID-19: Findings from Four UK Birth Cohort Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Sijbren Cnossen, 2020. "Excise Taxation for Domestic Resource Mobilization," CESifo Working Paper Series 8442, CESifo.
    5. Thulasee Jose & J Taylor Hays & David O. Warner, 2020. "Improved Documentation of Electronic Cigarette Use in an Electronic Health Record," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-7, August.
    6. Kerem Shuval & Michal Stoklosa & Nigar Nargis & Jeffrey Drope & Shay Tzafrir & Lital Keinan-Boker & Laura F. DeFina & Mahmoud Qadan, 2021. "Cigarette Prices and Smoking Behavior in Israel: Findings from a National Study of Adults (2002–2017)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Maryam Mirza, 2019. "Advertising Restrictions and Market Concentration in the Cigarette Industry: A Cross-Country Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Kh. Jitenkumar Singh & A. Jiran Meitei & Nongzaimayum Tawfeeq Alee & Mosoniro Kriina & Nirendrakumar Singh Haobijam, 2022. "Machine learning algorithms for predicting smokeless tobacco status among women in Northeastern States, India," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2629-2639, October.
    9. Li Zhang & Yanhan Chen & Yalan Lv & Xia Yang & Qianyu Yin & Li Bai & Yaling Luo & Manoj Sharma & Yong Zhao, 2019. "The Perception and Intervention of Internship Nursing Students Helping Smokers to Quit: A Cross-Sectional Study in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Fazal-e-Hasan, Syed Muhammad & Ahmadi, Hormoz & Mortimer, Gary & Sekhon, Harjit & Kharouf, Husni & Jebarajakirthy, Charles, 2020. "The interplay of positive and negative emotions to quit unhealthy consumption behaviors: Insights for social marketers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 349-360.
    11. Christopher M. Seitz & Kenneth D. Ward & Zubair Kabir, 2021. "Quitline Information Included on Cigarette Packaging: An Assessment of Country Adherence to WHO FCTC Guidelines, 2007 to 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-7, November.
    12. Behzad Raei & Sara Emamgholipour & Amirhossein Takian & Mehdi Yaseri & Ghahreman Abdoli & Ahad Alizadeh, 2021. "Distributional health and financial consequences of increased cigarette tax in Iran: extended cost-effectiveness analysis," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Phantara Chulasai & Dujrudee Chinwong & Surarong Chinwong & John J. Hall & Purida Vientong, 2021. "Feasibility of a Smoking Cessation Smartphone App (Quit with US) for Young Adult Smokers: A Single Arm, Pre-Post Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Małgorzata Znyk & Ilona Wężyk-Caba & Dorota Kaleta, 2022. "The Frequency of Tobacco Smoking and E-Cigarettes Use among Primary Health Care Patients—The Association between Anti-Tobacco Interventions and Smoking in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Ren, Yanjun & Castro Campos, Bente & Loy, Jens-Peter & Wang, Xiaobing, 2020. "Start Smoking Earlier, Smoke More: Does Education Matter?," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304237, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Yanlong Guo & Yinrui Xu & Denghang Chen, 2022. "Impact of Visual Elements of Tobacco Packaging on Health Risk Perceptions of Youth Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Ahnna Lee & Kang-Sook Lee & Dahyeon Lee & Hyeju Ahn & Hyun-Kyung Lee & Hyekyeong Kim & Jakyoung Lee & Hong-Gwan Seo, 2021. "The Utilization of National Tobacco Cessation Services among Female Smokers and the Need for a Gender-Responsive Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Young-shin Lim & Ji Young Lee, 2023. "A Comparative Analysis of E-Cigarette and Cigarette Posts on Instagram," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-12, February.
    19. Aurélie Nakamura & Olivier François & Johanna Lepeule, 2021. "Epigenetic Alterations of Maternal Tobacco Smoking during Pregnancy: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Sunee Lertsinudom & Pentipa Kaewketthong & Tamonwan Chankaew & Dujrudee Chinwong & Surarong Chinwong, 2021. "Smoking Cessation Services by Community Pharmacists: Real-World Practice in Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-12, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:875-:d:723922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.