IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p759-d721751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion

Author

Listed:
  • Janice Hui Ling Goh

    (Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras 56000, Malaysia)

  • Toh Leong Tan

    (Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras 56000, Malaysia)

  • Suraya Aziz

    (Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras 56000, Malaysia)

  • Iqbal Hussain Rizuana

    (Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras 56000, Malaysia)

Abstract

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a fairly recent breast imaging technique invented to overcome the challenges of overlapping breast tissue. Ultrasonography (USG) was used as a complementary tool to DBT for the purpose of this study. Nonetheless, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the most sensitive tool to detect breast lesion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performance of DBT, with and without USG, versus breast MRI in correlation to histopathological examination (HPE). This was a retrospective study in a university hospital over a duration of 24 months. Findings were acquired from a formal report and were correlated with HPE. The sensitivity of DBT with or without USG was lower than MRI. However, the accuracy, specificity and PPV were raised with the aid of USG to equivalent or better than MRI. These three modalities showed statistically significant in correlation with HPE ( p < 0.005, chi-squared). Generally, DBT alone has lower sensitivity as compared to MRI. However, it is reassuring that DBT + USG could significantly improve diagnostic performance to that comparable to MRI. In conclusion, results of this study are vital to centers which do not have MRI, as complementary ultrasound can accentuate diagnostic performance of DBT.

Suggested Citation

  • Janice Hui Ling Goh & Toh Leong Tan & Suraya Aziz & Iqbal Hussain Rizuana, 2022. "Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:759-:d:721751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/759/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/759/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Na Cao & Hongtao Liang & Ruoyu Zhang & Yanhua Li & Hui Cao, 2022. "A New Nonlinear Photothermal Iterative Theory for Port-Wine Stain Detection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:759-:d:721751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.