IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p661-d719692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Nurse–Physician Collaboration, Moral Distress, and Professional Autonomy on Job Satisfaction among Nurses Acting as Physician Assistants

Author

Listed:
  • Yunmi Kim

    (Graduate School of Health Science, Hallym University, Hallymdaehakgil 1, Gangwon-do, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
    Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seongan-ro 150, Gangdong-gu, Seoul 05355, Korea)

  • Younjae Oh

    (Research Institute of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Hallym University, Hallymdaehakgil 1, Gangwon-do, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

  • Eunhee Lee

    (Research Institute of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Hallym University, Hallymdaehakgil 1, Gangwon-do, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

  • Shin-Jeong Kim

    (Research Institute of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Hallym University, Hallymdaehakgil 1, Gangwon-do, Chuncheon 24252, Korea)

Abstract

Although there is considerable literature on job satisfaction among nurses in various settings, there is little research about contributing factors, including moral distress to job satisfaction among a certain group of nurses, such as nurses acting as physician assistants. The purpose of this study was to verify the impact of nurse–physician collaboration, moral distress, and professional autonomy on job satisfaction among nurses acting as physician assistants. Descriptive and correlational research was conducted on a convenience sample of 130 nurses from five general hospitals in South Korea. In the final regression model, the adjusted R square was significant, explaining 38.2% of the variance of job satisfaction (F = 8.303, p < 0.001), where ‘cooperativeness’ (β = 0.469, p = 0.001) from nurse–physician collaboration, ‘institutional and contextual factor’ from moral distress (β = −0.292, p = 0.014), and professional autonomy (β = 0.247, p = 0.015) were included. In hospital environments, a more cooperative inter-professional relationship between nurses and physicians led to less moral distress caused by organisational constraints. A higher level of professional autonomy among nurses acting as physician assistants is required to increase their job satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunmi Kim & Younjae Oh & Eunhee Lee & Shin-Jeong Kim, 2022. "Impact of Nurse–Physician Collaboration, Moral Distress, and Professional Autonomy on Job Satisfaction among Nurses Acting as Physician Assistants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:661-:d:719692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/661/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/661/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moonok Kim & Younjae Oh & Byunghye Kong, 2020. "Ethical Conflicts Experienced by Nurses in Geriatric Hospitals in South Korea: “If You Can’t Stand the Heat, Get Out of the Kitchen”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boram Lee & Younjae Oh & Eunhee Lee & Kyoung A Nam, 2022. "Validation of the Korean Version of Nurses’ Moral Courage Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Risto Nikunlaakso & Kirsikka Selander & Elina Weiste & Eveliina Korkiakangas & Maria Paavolainen & Tiina Koivisto & Jaana Laitinen, 2022. "Understanding Moral Distress among Eldercare Workers: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:661-:d:719692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.