IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16614-d999687.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Including a Three-Party Meeting Using the Demand and Ability Protocol in an Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programme for a Successful Return to Work Process

Author

Listed:
  • Katarina Aili

    (Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
    Department of Health and Sport, School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, 301 18 Halmstad, Sweden)

  • Therese Hellman

    (Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
    Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Magnus Svartengren

    (Department of Medical Sciences, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden
    Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden)

  • Katarina Danielsson

    (Department of Medical Sciences, Psychiatry, Uppsala University, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden)

Abstract

The Demand and Ability Protocol (DAP) is used in three-party meetings involving an employee, an employer, and a representative from the rehabilitation team. The aim of this study is to investigate the inclusion of an intervention using the DAP in an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programme (IPRP) compared to usual care. This non-randomised controlled trial included patients assigned to an IPRP in Sweden. The intervention group received a DAP intervention targeting their work situation in addition to the usual care provided by the IPRP. The control group received IPRP only. Outcome measures were collected from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation. Results demonstrated improvements in both groups regarding self-reported anxiety, depression and EQ5D. Sleep was improved in the intervention group but not in the control group. No statistical differences in outcomes were observed between the groups. In conclusion, adding the DAP intervention to IPRP seemed to have the potential to improve sleep among the patients, which may indicate an overall improvement regarding health outcomes from a longer perspective. The results were less clear, however, regarding the work-related outcomes of sickness absence and workability.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarina Aili & Therese Hellman & Magnus Svartengren & Katarina Danielsson, 2022. "Including a Three-Party Meeting Using the Demand and Ability Protocol in an Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programme for a Successful Return to Work Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16614-:d:999687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16614/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16614/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Berglund & Ingrid Anderzén & Åsa Andersén & Lars Carlsson & Catharina Gustavsson & Thorne Wallman & Per Lytsy, 2018. "Multidisciplinary Intervention and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Return-to-Work and Increased Employability among Patients with Mental Illness and/or Chronic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Tria," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, October.
    2. Juhani Ilmarinen, 2019. "From Work Ability Research to Implementation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-7, August.
    3. Hedvig Zetterberg & Ida Flink & Sören Spörndly-Nees & Sofia Wagner & Rolf Karlsten & Pernilla Åsenlöf, 2022. "Behavioral Medicine Physiotherapy in the Context of Return to Work for Chronic Pain: A Single-Case Experimental Design Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johannes Carl & Eva Grüne & Johanna Popp & Klaus Pfeifer, 2020. "Physical Activity Promotion for Apprentices in Nursing Care and Automotive Mechatronics–Competence Counts More than Volume," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Petr Hlado & Klara Harvankova, 2024. "Teachers’ perceived work ability: a qualitative exploration using the Job Demands-Resources model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Cristiano Barreto de Miranda & João Silvestre Silva-Junior & Gisele Aparecida Fernandes & Frida Marina Fischer, 2020. "Trends in the Cumulative Incidence of Vocational Rehabilitation Indicators in Brazil, 2007–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-8, June.
    4. Henry Lipponen & Mirja Hirvensalo & Kasper Salin, 2022. "Older Physical Education Teachers’ Wellbeing at Work and Its Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Erik Berglund & Emilie Friberg & Monika Engblom & Åsa Andersén & Veronica Svärd, 2022. "Coordination and Perceived Support for Return to Work: A Cross-Sectional Study among Patients in Swedish Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-11, March.
    6. Elisabeth Nöhammer & Michaela Drexel, 2024. "The Potentials of Digital Workplace Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-24, July.
    7. Frida Marina Fischer & Maria Carmen Martinez & Camila Helaehil Alfredo & João Silvestre Silva-Junior & Jodi Oakman & Teresa Cotrim & Donald Fisher & Stephen Popkin & Gretchen A. Petery & Paul A. Schul, 2021. "Aging and the Future of Decent Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-11, August.
    8. Anabela Pereira & Elisabeth Brito & Isabel Souto & Bruno Alves, 2022. "Healthcare Services and Formal Caregiver’s Psychosocial Risk Factors: An Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-10, April.
    9. Monica Unsgaard-Tøndel & Anne Lovise Nordstoga, 2022. "Are Work Demand, Support and Control Associated with Work Ability and Disability during Back Pain Treatment? A Prospective Explorative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    10. Franca Barbic & Maura Minonzio & Beatrice Cairo & Dana Shiffer & Antonio Roberto Zamuner & Silvia Cavalieri & Franca Dipaola & Nicola Magnavita & Alberto Porta & Raffaello Furlan, 2020. "Work Ability Assessment and Its Relationship with Cardiovascular Autonomic Profile in Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    11. José-María Figueredo & Cristina García-Ael & Andrea Gragnano & Gabriela Topa, 2020. "Well-Being at Work after Return to Work (RTW): A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-27, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16614-:d:999687. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.