Author
Listed:
- Li Zhang
(Graduate School, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, China)
- Yan-Ning Yan
(Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China)
- Zeng-Xin Sun
(Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China)
- Dong-Rui Yan
(Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China)
- Yuan-Wu Chen
(Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China)
- Keh-Chung Lin
(School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 10055, Taiwan)
- Xin-Jing Ge
(Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China)
- Xiao-Lu Qin
(Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China)
Abstract
The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of a 3-month coaching-based teleoccupational guidance (CTG) programme for home-based stroke survivors and their family caregivers. An assessor-blind pilot randomised controlled study was conducted. Twenty-five participant dyads (each dyad consisted of one home-based stroke patient and their caregivers) were randomised to a control group (RTG, n = 12) or an experimental group (CTG, n = 13). Participant dyads in the RTG group received routine teleoccupational guidance. Participant dyads in the CTG group received a six-step procedure: coaching-based teleoccupational guidance over 3 months via WeChat. Participant dyad compliance, the difficulty and suitability of outcome measures, and adverse effects were used to assess feasibility. The Reintegration to Normal Living Index, the Lawton Instructive Activities of Daily Life (Lawton IADL) scale, the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, the Fugl–Meyer Assessment—Upper Extremity scale, the 6 min walking test, and the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale were used to assess effectiveness outcomes of home-based stroke survivors; the Caregiver Benefit Finding Scale and the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview were used to assess the effectiveness outcomes of family caregivers. Feasibility measures were assessed at the end of the pilot trial, and effectiveness measures were evaluated pre-intervention and post-intervention (after 3 months). The CTG programme significantly improved home-based stroke survivors’ participation in daily life, IADL score, and intrinsic motivation, and increased caregivers’ perceived benefit, and tended (not significantly) to reduce care burden. CTG has the potential to promote better integration of home-based stroke patients into their families and society, improve their quality of life and family well-being, and provide a reference for home rehabilitation of other clinical chronic diseases. CTG is a safe, effective, and promising intervention for home-based stroke populations and their caregivers and warrants further investigation in a larger randomised controlled trial.
Suggested Citation
Li Zhang & Yan-Ning Yan & Zeng-Xin Sun & Dong-Rui Yan & Yuan-Wu Chen & Keh-Chung Lin & Xin-Jing Ge & Xiao-Lu Qin, 2022.
"Effects of Coaching-Based Teleoccupational Guidance for Home-Based Stroke Survivors and Their Family Caregivers: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16355-:d:995169
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16355-:d:995169. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.