IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p16263-d993681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Factors for Mortality in Emergently Admitted Patients with Acute Gastric Ulcer: An Analysis of 15,538 Patients in National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2014

Author

Listed:
  • Maksat Idris

    (New York Medical College, School of Medicine and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA)

  • Abbas Smiley

    (New York Medical College, School of Medicine and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA)

  • Saral Patel

    (New York Medical College, School of Medicine and Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA)

  • Rifat Latifi

    (Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA)

Abstract

Background: Patients admitted emergently with a primary diagnosis of acute gastric ulcer have significant complications including morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to assess the risk factors of mortality including the role of surgery in gastric ulcers. Methods: Adult (18–64-year-old) and elderly (≥65-year-old) patients admitted emergently with hemorrhagic and/or perforated gastric ulcers, were analyzed using the National Inpatient Sample database, 2005–2014. Demographics, various clinical data, and associated comorbidities were collected. A stratified analysis was combined with a multivariable logistic regression model to assess predictors of mortality. Results: Our study analyzed a total of 15,538 patients, split independently into two age groups: 6338 adult patients and 9200 elderly patients. The mean age (SD) was 50.42 (10.65) in adult males vs. 51.10 (10.35) in adult females ( p < 0.05). The mean age (SD) was 76.72 (7.50) in elderly males vs. 79.03 (7.80) in elderly females ( p < 0.001). The percentage of total deceased adults was 1.9% and the percentage of total deceased elderly was 3.7%, a difference by a factor of 1.94. Out of 3283 adult patients who underwent surgery, 32.1% had perforated non-hemorrhagic ulcers vs. 1.8% in the non-surgical counterparts ( p < 0.001). In the 4181 elderly surgical patients, 18.1% had perforated non-hemorrhagic ulcers vs. 1.2% in the non-surgical counterparts ( p < 0.001). In adult patients managed surgically, 2.6% were deceased, while in elderly patients managed surgically, 5.5% were deceased. The mortality of non-surgical counterparts in both age groups were lower ( p < 0.001). The multivariable logistic regression model for adult patients electing surgery found delayed surgery, frailty, and the presence of perforations to be the main risk factors for mortality. In the regression model for elderly surgical patients, delayed surgery, frailty, presence of perforations, the male sex, and age were the main risk factors for mortality. In contrast, the regression model for adult patients with no surgery found hospital length of stay to be the main risk factor for mortality, whereas invasive diagnostic procedures were protective. In elderly non-surgical patients, hospital length of stay, presence of perforations, age, and frailty were the main risk factors for mortality, while invasive diagnostic procedures were protective. The following comorbidities were associated with gastric ulcers: alcohol abuse, deficiency anemias, chronic blood loss, chronic heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, hypertension, fluid/electrolyte disorders, uncomplicated diabetes, and renal failure. Conclusions: The odds of mortality in emergently admitted geriatric patients with acute gastric ulcer was two times that in adult patients. Surgery was a protective factor for patients admitted emergently with gastric perforated non-hemorrhagic ulcers.

Suggested Citation

  • Maksat Idris & Abbas Smiley & Saral Patel & Rifat Latifi, 2022. "Risk Factors for Mortality in Emergently Admitted Patients with Acute Gastric Ulcer: An Analysis of 15,538 Patients in National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2014," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16263-:d:993681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16263/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16263/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lior Levy & Abbas Smiley & Rifat Latifi, 2022. "Adult and Elderly Risk Factors of Mortality in 23,614 Emergently Admitted Patients with Rectal or Rectosigmoid Junction Malignancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Lior Levy & Abbas Smiley & Rifat Latifi, 2022. "Mortality Risk Factors in Patients Admitted with the Primary Diagnosis of Tracheostomy Complications: An Analysis of 8026 Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Saral Patel & Abbas Smiley & Cailan Feingold & Bardia Khandehroo & Agon Kajmolli & Rifat Latifi, 2022. "Chances of Mortality Are 3.5-Times Greater in Elderly Patients with Umbilical Hernia Than in Adult Patients: An Analysis of 21,242 Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Guy Elgar & Abbas Smiley & Rifat Latifi, 2022. "Major Risk Factors for Mortality in Elderly and Non-Elderly Adult Patients Emergently Admitted for Blunt Chest Wall Trauma: Hospital Length of Stay as an Independent Predictor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Ladinsky & Abbas Smiley & Rifat Latifi, 2023. "Elderly Patients Managed Non-Operatively with Abscesses of the Anorectal Region Have Five Times Higher Rate of Mortality Compared to Non-Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Saral Patel & Abbas Smiley & Cailan Feingold & Bardia Khandehroo & Agon Kajmolli & Rifat Latifi, 2022. "Chances of Mortality Are 3.5-Times Greater in Elderly Patients with Umbilical Hernia Than in Adult Patients: An Analysis of 21,242 Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16263-:d:993681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.