IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15956-d988597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microplastic Contamination and Ecological Status of Freshwater Ecosystems: A Case Study in Two Northern Portuguese Rivers

Author

Listed:
  • Andreia Ribeiro

    (Landscape Laboratory, Rua da Ponte Romana, Creixomil, 4835-095 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Carlos Gravato

    (Faculty of Sciences of University of Lisbon & Centro de Estudos de Ambiente e Mar (CESAM), University of Lisbon, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • João Cardoso

    (Department of Biology, Campus de Gualtar, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal)

  • Carlos Alexandre Ribeiro

    (Landscape Laboratory, Rua da Ponte Romana, Creixomil, 4835-095 Guimarães, Portugal)

  • Maria Natividade Vieira

    (Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal)

  • Carolina Rodrigues

    (Landscape Laboratory, Rua da Ponte Romana, Creixomil, 4835-095 Guimarães, Portugal)

Abstract

Background: Most European rivers have not yet achieved “good” ecological status. In addition, the presence and abundance of microplastics (MPs) in freshwater is a matter of great concern to the scientific community. Methodology: This study assesses the ecological status of four sampling sites of Selho (S1–S4) and Costa-Couros (C1–C4) rivers (Guimarães, Portugal), and the abundance of MPs in sediments and benthic macroinvertebrates (Oligochaeta) from those sites. Results: All sites of both rivers under higher pressure did not reach a “good” ecological status (S2–S3, C2–C4) based on the macroinvertebrate community. High levels of nutrients were observed at all sites in both rivers (except C2), especially phosphorus. In the Oligochaeta’s gut of Costa-Couros river, the high number of MPs seems to be associated with their weight (95.25 ± 25.61 to 1069.00 ± 385.30 MPs g/fresh weight), suggesting the existence of malnutrition and digestive disorders, whereas the highest number of MPs in gut (134.00 ± 30.36 to 558.6 ± 100.70 MPs g/fresh weight) were found for the heaviest organisms of Selho. Conclusions: Thus, sites with higher ecological status do not necessarily have lower abundance of MPs. In the sediments, urbanization seems to be the main driver for MP contamination. MP contamination is pervasive across the sediments and Oligochaeta’s gut in both rivers. Since MPs have the potential to cause harm to environmental and human health, it is essential to monitor not only the ecological status of freshwaters, but also emerging pollutants such as MPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreia Ribeiro & Carlos Gravato & João Cardoso & Carlos Alexandre Ribeiro & Maria Natividade Vieira & Carolina Rodrigues, 2022. "Microplastic Contamination and Ecological Status of Freshwater Ecosystems: A Case Study in Two Northern Portuguese Rivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15956-:d:988597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15956/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15956/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bárbara Sá & Joana Pais & Joana Antunes & João Pequeno & Ana Pires & Paula Sobral, 2022. "Seasonal Abundance and Distribution Patterns of Microplastics in the Lis River, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valentin Marian Antohi & Romeo Victor Ionescu & Monica Laura Zlati & Catalina Iticescu & Puiu Lucian Georgescu & Madalina Calmuc, 2023. "Regional Regression Correlation Model of Microplastic Water Pollution Control Using Circular Economy Tools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15956-:d:988597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.