IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15936-d988198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Medical Devices Help Mitigate Global Environmental Change Effects on Human and Animal Health? A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Mancini

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Stefania Marcheggiani

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Mario Figliomeni

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Elisabetta Volpi

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Luca Avellis

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Volpi

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Anna Maria D’Angelo

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Cristina Romanelli

    (Notified Body 0373, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy)

  • Pietro Calamea

    (Ministry of Health, Viale Giorgio Ribotta, 5, 00144 Rome, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Tancioni

    (Biology Department, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Cinzia Ferrari

    (Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Globalization and urbanization are new challenges for the ability to protect public health. Indeed, the anthropogenic impact is changing the environment on a global scale. These changes can have direct and indirect health effects on both human and animal populations, introducing new diseases. Heat waves and floods are an example of these changes. Global Environmental Change (GEC) consequences on human health and well-being are stronger in urban areas, which are inhabited by 70% of the European population. In this context, the use of appropriate medical devices can also help mitigate the effects of climate change. Studies into lifestyle, environment quality and potential fields of application can be useful tools to identify possible types of medical device that could help to support the therapeutic needs and the prevention of health both in everyday life, and in the case of environmental alerts. A study was carried out on the potential role of medical devices (MDs) in mitigating the effects of GEC on human and animal health, by issuing two different questionnaires to specific professional clusters: the first to doctors, pharmacists, and veterinarians, the second to MD manufacturers. The data obtained from this study confirm the strong connection between GEC and the increase in the use of some MDs. Results obtained from questionnaires circulated to MD manufacturers confirmed this trend. MD manufacturers also declared that there are no longer any seasonal trends in market demand for some medical devices. This is a pilot study to consider MDs as a mitigation tool for CEGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Mancini & Stefania Marcheggiani & Mario Figliomeni & Elisabetta Volpi & Luca Avellis & Fabrizio Volpi & Anna Maria D’Angelo & Cristina Romanelli & Pietro Calamea & Lorenzo Tancioni & Cinzia Ferr, 2022. "Can Medical Devices Help Mitigate Global Environmental Change Effects on Human and Animal Health? A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15936-:d:988198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15936/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15936/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard C. Stedman, 2004. "Risk and Climate Change: Perceptions of Key Policy Actors in Canada," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5), pages 1395-1406, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yingying Sun & Ziqiang Han, 2018. "Climate Change Risk Perception in Taiwan: Correlation with Individual and Societal Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Muhammad Usman & Muhammad Wasim & Rao Bahkat Yawar, 2023. "Assessing the Economic Implications of Climate Change on Agriculture in Punjab in Pakistan: Farmers Perception and Satisfaction," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 348-365.
    3. Muhammad Usman & Muhammad Wasim & Rao Bahkat Yawar, 2023. "Assessing the Economic Implications of Climate Change on Agriculture in Punjab in Pakistan: Farmers Perception and Satisfaction," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 12(3), pages 501-518.
    4. Meredith Frances Dobbie & Rebekah Ruth Brown, 2014. "A Framework for Understanding Risk Perception, Explored from the Perspective of the Water Practitioner," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 294-308, February.
    5. Nicholas Smith & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2014. "The Role of Emotion in Global Warming Policy Support and Opposition," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 937-948, May.
    6. Guillaume Simonet & Alexia Leseur, 2019. "Barriers and drivers to adaptation to climate change—a field study of ten French local authorities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 621-637, August.
    7. Bonita L. McFarlane & David O. T. Witson, 2008. "Perceptions of Ecological Risk Associated with Mountain Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) Infestations in Banff and Kootenay National Parks of Canada," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 203-212, February.
    8. Lianying Yao & Jinchi Shen & Fuying Zhang & Xinbing Gu & Shuli Jiang, 2021. "Influence of Environmental Values on the Typhoon Risk Perceptions of High School Students: A Case Study in Ningbo, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Nicholas Smith & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2012. "The Rise of Global Warming Skepticism: Exploring Affective Image Associations in the United States Over Time," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 1021-1032, June.
    10. Bose, Neha & Hills, Thomas & Sgroi, Daniel, 2020. "Climate Change and Diet," IZA Discussion Papers 13426, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Andrew Knight, 2007. "Do Worldviews Matter? Post-materialist, Environmental, and Scientific/Technological Worldviews and Support for Agricultural Biotechnology Applications," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(8), pages 1047-1063, December.
    12. Ralf Barkemeyer & Frank Figge & Andreas Hoepner & Diane Holt & Johannes Marcelus Kraak & Pei-Shan Yu, 2017. "Media coverage of climate change: An international comparison," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(6), pages 1029-1054, September.
    13. Lauren Feldman & P. Sol Hart, 2018. "Is There Any Hope? How Climate Change News Imagery and Text Influence Audience Emotions and Support for Climate Mitigation Policies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(3), pages 585-602, March.
    14. Özcureci Berker & Tuğrul Tuğba, 2023. "The Interplay Between Risk Framing, Attitude toward Policy, Negative Affect and Hard Policy Support," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 122-128, July.
    15. Tai-Yi Yu & Tai-Kuei Yu, 2017. "The Moderating Effects of Students’ Personality Traits on Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intentions in Response to Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Christopher Nathan & Keith Hyams, 2022. "Global policymakers and catastrophic risk," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 3-21, March.
    17. Bonita L. McFarlane, 2005. "Public Perceptions of Risk to Forest Biodiversity," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3), pages 543-553, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15936-:d:988198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.