IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15580-d982415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban–Rural Differences in Mental and Physical Health among Primary Care Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Clinical Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Levi N. Bonnell

    (Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Jessica Clifton

    (Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Gail L. Rose

    (Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

  • Elizabeth N. Waddell

    (Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97201, USA)

  • Benjamin Littenberg

    (Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA)

Abstract

Purpose: Rural health disparities are largely attributable to access to healthcare, socioeconomic status, and health behaviors. Little is known about the persistence of these disparities when differences in access to care are eliminated. We sought to investigate urban–rural differences in physical and mental health in primary care patients with demonstrated access to primary care. Methods: We obtained cross-sectional survey responses from a multicenter randomized controlled trial on 2726 adult primary care patients with multiple chronic medical or behavioral conditions from 42 primary care practices in 13 states. Study outcomes include measures of mental health including: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-29 ® ), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), as well as physical health including: the PROMIS-29 ® and the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). Urban–rural residence was indicated by census-tract Rural Urban Commuting Areas of the participant’s home address. Differences in mental and physical health outcomes attributable to rurality were assessed using multilevel models with a random intercept for census-tract. Results: After adjustment for demographic and neighborhood characteristics, urban residents had significantly worse generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7) (ß = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.1, 1.3; p = 0.027), depression (PHQ-9) (ß = 0.7; 95% CI = 0.1, 1.4; p = 0.024), and functional capacity (DASI) (ß = −0.4; 95% CI = −0.5, −0.2; p < 0.001) compared to rural residents. Urban residents also had significantly worse anxiety and depression as measured by the PROMIS-29 ® compared to their rural counterparts. There were no urban–rural differences in the other PROMIS-29 ® subdomains. Conclusions: Among adults with demonstrated access to care and multiple diagnosed chronic conditions, rural residents had better mental health and functional capacity than their urban counterparts. This finding is not consistent with prior research documenting rural health disparities and should be confirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Levi N. Bonnell & Jessica Clifton & Gail L. Rose & Elizabeth N. Waddell & Benjamin Littenberg, 2022. "Urban–Rural Differences in Mental and Physical Health among Primary Care Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-10, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15580-:d:982415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15580/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15580/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weeks, W.B. & Kazis, L.E. & Shen, Y. & Cong, Z. & Ren, X.S. & Miller, D. & Lee, A. & Perlin, J.B., 2004. "Differences in health-related quality of life in rural and urban veterans," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(10), pages 1762-1767.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vaishar Antonín & Vidovićová Lucie & Figueiredo Elisabete, 2018. "Quality of Rural Life. Editorial 16 June 2018," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 180-190, June.
    2. Sonia Chien-I Chen & Chenglian Liu & Ridong Hu, 2020. "Fad or Trend? Rethinking the Sustainability of Connected Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Sonia Chien-I. Chen & Chenglian Liu, 2020. "Factors Influencing the Application of Connected Health in Remote Areas, Taiwan: A Qualitative Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Lianjie Wang & Yao Tang & Farnaz Roshanmehr & Xiao Bai & Farzad Taghizadeh-Hesary & Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2021. "The Health Status Transition and Medical Expenditure Evaluation of Elderly Population in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Pei-Hung Wen & Chin-Li Lu & Carol Strong & Yih-Jyh Lin & Yao-Li Chen & Chung-Yi Li & Chiang-Chin Tsai, 2018. "Demographic and Urbanization Disparities of Liver Transplantation in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Olivio J Clay & Martinique Perkins & Gail Wallace & Michael Crowe & Patricia Sawyer & Cynthia J Brown, 2018. "Associations of Multimorbid Medical Conditions and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Older African American Men," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(2), pages 258-266.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15580-:d:982415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.