IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15533-d981612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model-Based Biomechanical Exoskeleton Concept Optimization for a Representative Lifting Task in Logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Schiebl

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Mark Tröster

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Wiem Idoudi

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Elena Gneiting

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Leon Spies

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Christophe Maufroy

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Urs Schneider

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Institute of Industrial Manufacturing and Management IFF, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Thomas Bauernhansl

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Institute of Industrial Manufacturing and Management IFF, University of Stuttgart, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Occupational exoskeletons are a promising solution to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). However, there are no established systems that support heavy lifting to shoulder height. Thus, this work presents a model-based analysis of heavy lifting activities and subsequent exoskeleton concept optimization. Six motion sequences were captured in the laboratory for three subjects and analyzed in multibody simulations with respect to muscle activities (MAs) and joint forces (JFs). The most strenuous sequence was selected and utilized in further simulations of a human model connected to 32 exoskeleton concept variants. Six simulated concepts were compared concerning occurring JFs and MAs as well as interaction loads in the exoskeleton arm interfaces. Symmetric uplifting of a 21 kg box from hip to shoulder height was identified as the most strenuous motion sequence with highly loaded arms, shoulders, and back. Six concept variants reduced mean JFs (spine: >70%, glenohumeral joint: >69%) and MAs (back: >63%, shoulder: >59% in five concepts). Parasitic loads in the arm bracing varied strongly among variants. An exoskeleton design was identified that effectively supports heavy lifting, combining high musculoskeletal relief and low parasitic loads. The applied workflow can help developers in the optimization of exoskeletons.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Schiebl & Mark Tröster & Wiem Idoudi & Elena Gneiting & Leon Spies & Christophe Maufroy & Urs Schneider & Thomas Bauernhansl, 2022. "Model-Based Biomechanical Exoskeleton Concept Optimization for a Representative Lifting Task in Logistics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15533-:d:981612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15533/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15533/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Tröster & Sarah Budde & Christophe Maufroy & Michael Skipper Andersen & John Rasmussen & Urs Schneider & Thomas Bauernhansl, 2022. "Biomechanical Analysis of Stoop and Free-Style Squat Lifting and Lowering with a Generic Back-Support Exoskeleton Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15533-:d:981612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.