IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15528-d981433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of a Nursing Workload Measurement Scale, Based on the Classification of Nursing Interventions, for Adult Hospitalization Units

Author

Listed:
  • María Fuensanta Hellín Gil

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
    Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), 30120 Murcia, Spain)

  • María Dolores Roldán Valcárcel

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
    Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), 30120 Murcia, Spain)

  • Ana Myriam Seva Llor

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
    Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), 30120 Murcia, Spain)

  • Francisco Javier Ibáñez-López

    (Education Faculty, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain)

  • Marzena Mikla

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
    Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), 30120 Murcia, Spain)

  • María José López Montesinos

    (Faculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
    Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB), 30120 Murcia, Spain)

Abstract

We conducted validation of a scale to measure nursing workloads, previously designed using NIC interventions within the four nursing functions (patient care, teaching, management, and research). Methods: This is an analytical, descriptive, prospective, and observational study using qualitative methodology (focus groups and in-depth interviews) with a quantitative and qualitative section (committee of experts and real application of the scale through a validation pilot and with multicentric application, including hospitalization units of internal medicine and surgery of four hospitals). Qualitative analysis was performed with Atlas.ti8 and quantitative analysis with R. Results: Qualitatively, all the participants agreed on the need to measure workloads in all nursing functions with standardized terminology. The expert committee found greater relevance (91.67%) in “prevention” and “health education” as well as consistency with the construct and adequate wording in 99% of the selected items. In the pilot test and multicenter application, the nurses spent more time on the caring dimension, in the morning shift, and on the items “self-care”, “medication”, “health education”, “care of invasive procedures”, “wounds care”, “comfort”, and “fluid therapy”. Cronbach’s alpha 0.727, composite reliability 0.685, AVE 0.099, and omega coefficient 0.704 were all acceptable. Construct validity: KMO 0.5 and Bartlett’s test were significant. Conclusions: The scale can be considered valid to measure nursing workloads, both qualitatively in obtaining the consensus of experts and health personnel and quantitatively, with acceptable reliability and validity superior to other similar scales.

Suggested Citation

  • María Fuensanta Hellín Gil & María Dolores Roldán Valcárcel & Ana Myriam Seva Llor & Francisco Javier Ibáñez-López & Marzena Mikla & María José López Montesinos, 2022. "Validation of a Nursing Workload Measurement Scale, Based on the Classification of Nursing Interventions, for Adult Hospitalization Units," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15528-:d:981433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15528/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15528/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María Fuensanta Hellín Gil & José Antonio Ruiz Hernández & Francisco Javier Ibáñez-López & Ana Myriam Seva Llor & Maria Dolores Roldán Valcárcel & Marzena Mikla & María José López Montesinos, 2022. "Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Workload of Nurses in Adult Inpatient Units," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marina Mondo & Gianfranco Cicotto & Jessica Pileri & Ester Cois & Silvia De Simone, 2023. "Promote Well-Being and Innovation in Sustainable Organizations: The Role of Job Crafting as Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15528-:d:981433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.