IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15498-d981091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of Need for Further Refinement in a Clear Aligner Treatment among Orthodontists, Dentists and Laypeople: A Retrospective Study

Author

Listed:
  • Patrícia Oliveira

    (Department of Orthodontics, Egas Moniz—Cooperativa de Ensino Superior CRL, Monte da Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal)

  • Iman Bugaighis

    (Department of Orthodontics, Egas Moniz—Cooperativa de Ensino Superior CRL, Monte da Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal
    The Libyan Authority for Scientific Research, Tripoli P.O. Box 80045, Libya)

  • Hélder Nunes Costa

    (Department of Orthodontics, Egas Moniz—Cooperativa de Ensino Superior CRL, Monte da Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal
    Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz, Egas Moniz—Cooperativa de Ensino Superior CRL, Monte da Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal)

  • Pedro Mariano Pereira

    (Department of Orthodontics, Egas Moniz—Cooperativa de Ensino Superior CRL, Monte da Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal
    Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz, Egas Moniz—Cooperativa de Ensino Superior CRL, Monte da Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal)

Abstract

Clear aligner treatment often requires further refinement to improve the orthodontic treatment outcome. However, the perceptions of treatment outcomes evaluated by orthodontists and dentists are sparse, and laypeople’s perceptions have yet to be explored. Here, we explore the perceptions of orthodontists, dentists, and laypeople concerning the treatment outcomes achieved after completing the first sequence of aligners. This cross-sectional study involved 37 orthodontists, 67 dentists, and 93 laypeople. We administered an online questionnaire containing intra-oral photographs of nine completed cases with pre- and post-first sequences of aligners. As a control, we used a digital prediction system for the treatment outcome. Self-perception was reported using a visual analog scale. Both orthodontists and dentists had similar perceptions about treatment outcomes ( p = 0.363) but significantly differed from laypeople ( p ≤ 0.0001). Both orthodontists and dentists recommended further treatment; orthodontists were more critical than dentists ( p ≤ 0.001). Orthodontists were more critical than dentists in their evaluations of the need for further treatments; however, their perceptions of treatment outcomes were similar. Laypeople were more satisfied with the treatment outcomes, were less concerned with occlusion, and were more focused on the aesthetic results of the treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrícia Oliveira & Iman Bugaighis & Hélder Nunes Costa & Pedro Mariano Pereira, 2022. "Perception of Need for Further Refinement in a Clear Aligner Treatment among Orthodontists, Dentists and Laypeople: A Retrospective Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-10, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15498-:d:981091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15498-:d:981091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.