IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15403-d979621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinicians’ Emotional Reactions toward Patients with Depressive Symptoms in Mood Disorders: A Narrative Scoping Review of Empirical Research

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Stefana

    (Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy)

  • Paolo Fusar-Poli

    (Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
    OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London SE5 8AZ, UK
    Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-Detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK)

  • Cristina Gnisci

    (Riabilmente—Centro di Riabilitazione Monterotondo, Monterotondo, 00015 Roma, Italy)

  • Eduard Vieta

    (Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, University of Barcelona Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBER-SAM, 08007 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain)

  • Eric A. Youngstrom

    (Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
    Helping Give Away Psychological Science (HGAPS.org), Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to narratively review the empirical literature on clinicians’ emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses (i.e., countertransference) to depressive and other symptoms of patients with mood disorders. Therapist subjective responses (countertransference) can negatively affect both diagnostic and therapeutic processes, especially when they are not recognized and managed promptly. However, at the same time, countertransference recognition, processing, and management can help inform the diagnostic process and improve the therapy process and outcome. In the last couple of decades, the number of studies that empirically explore countertransference toward mood disordered patients, as well as its relationship with various characteristics of both patients and treatment, has increased. Current evidence suggests that patients with depression tend to elicit more positive feelings among clinicians than patients with other severe mental disorders such as borderline personality disorder or schizophrenia. Furthermore, it documents the existence of associations between patients’ severity of depressive symptoms and clinicians’ subjective reactions, although the results regarding which specific countertransference patterns are evoked in relation to the different phases of the treatment are not entirely consistent. Lastly, growing evidence suggests the presence of clinicians’ specific emotional reactions towards patients with suicidal ideation and behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Stefana & Paolo Fusar-Poli & Cristina Gnisci & Eduard Vieta & Eric A. Youngstrom, 2022. "Clinicians’ Emotional Reactions toward Patients with Depressive Symptoms in Mood Disorders: A Narrative Scoping Review of Empirical Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-23, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15403-:d:979621
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15403/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15403/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pernille Brøsholen & Randi Ulberg & Hanne-Sofie Johnsen Dahl & Agneta Thorén, 2022. "Therapists’ Emotional Responses in Individual Therapy with Depressed Adolescents: An Evaluation of the Data Structure of the Feeling-Word Checklist—28," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15403-:d:979621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.