IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15388-d979376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Specific Needs of Patients and Staff Reflected in the Design of an Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Hospital—Design Recommendations Based on a Case Study (Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Agata Gawlak

    (Faculty of Architecture, Institute of Architecture, Urban Planning and Heritage Protection, Poznan University of Technology, 60965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Marta Stankiewicz

    (Faculty of Architecture, Institute of Architecture, Urban Planning and Heritage Protection, Poznan University of Technology, 60965 Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

This article presents results of the research conducted with the use of participatory methods by the Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology on architectural design of healthcare facilities. The studies concerned the needs of patients and hospital staff in an orthopaedic and rehabilitation hospital. Preferences and expectations of all the users of healthcare facilities should be considered as early as at the stage of planning and designing. The hospital profile and the type of its users predetermine the architectural design in the area of the building functions, its internal circulation and interior design. Participation of the user in the process of compiling design recommendations is a chance for a designer to confront the original assumptions with expectations and to adjust relevant solutions to factual needs of the users. This study, undertaken in a regional setting, provided an in-depth exploration of staff’s experiences of hospital space to indicate possible spatial improvements. Methods: The research was conducted on the basis of a case study of a renowned regional orthopaedic and rehabilitation hospital in Poznan, Poland. Rapid assessment methods and questions were examined to describe current approaches and synthesize results. Semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis identified staff and patient’s experiences. Result: Participation of hospital staff and patients resulted in design recommendations of high utility value. It was found that the two groups to a certain extent proposed similar recommendations; however, certain proposals submitted by the two groups were totally opposite. Conclusion: the research highlighted the importance of the active research methodology that engages the researcher/expert in the action and critical reflection process. Such a methodology can successfully underlie the formulation of accurate recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Agata Gawlak & Marta Stankiewicz, 2022. "Specific Needs of Patients and Staff Reflected in the Design of an Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Hospital—Design Recommendations Based on a Case Study (Poland)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15388-:d:979376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Ridge & Gregory M. Peterson & Bastian M. Seidel & Vinah Anderson & Rosie Nash, 2021. "Healthcare Providers’ Perceptions of Potentially Preventable Rural Hospitalisations: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Ridge & Gregory M. Peterson & Rosie Nash, 2022. "Risk Factors Associated with Preventable Hospitalisation among Rural Community-Dwelling Patients: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15388-:d:979376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.