IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p14799-d968817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interprofessional Identity in Health and Social Care: Analysis and Synthesis of the Assumptions and Conceptions in the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriël Rafaël Cantaert

    (Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Research Group Interprofessional Collaboration in Education, Research and Practice (IPC-ERP), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Peter Pype

    (Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Research Group Interprofessional Collaboration in Education, Research and Practice (IPC-ERP), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Martin Valcke

    (Department of Educational Studies, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Emelien Lauwerier

    (Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Research Group Interprofessional Collaboration in Education, Research and Practice (IPC-ERP), Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

Interprofessional identity (IPI) development is considered essential in reducing incongruency and improving interprofessional collaboration. However, noticeable differences in conceptualizations are being put forward in the literature, hindering interpretation of research findings and translation into practice. Therefore, a Concept Analysis and Critical Interpretative Synthesis of empirical research articles were conducted to explore the assumptions and conceptions of IPI. Independent literature screening by two researchers led to the inclusion and extraction of 39 out of 1334 articles. Through critical analysis, higher order themes were constructed and translated to a synthesizing argument and a conceptual framework depicting what constitutes IPI (attributes), the boundary conditions (antecedents) and the outcomes (consequences) of its development. The attributes refer to both IPI’s structural properties and the core beliefs indicative of an interprofessional orientation. The antecedents inform us on the importance of IPI-fitting constructivist learning environments and intergroup leadership in enabling its development. This development may lead to several consequences with regard to professional wellbeing, team effectiveness and the quintuple aim. Given the educational orientation of this study, ways for facilitating and assessing the development of IPI among learners across the professional continuum have been proposed, although empirical research is needed to further validate links and mediating and moderating variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriël Rafaël Cantaert & Peter Pype & Martin Valcke & Emelien Lauwerier, 2022. "Interprofessional Identity in Health and Social Care: Analysis and Synthesis of the Assumptions and Conceptions in the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-29, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14799-:d:968817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14799/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14799/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulf Liebe & Elias Naumann & Andreas Tutic, 2019. "Prosocial Behavior Across Professional Boundaries: Experimental Evidence From Hospitals," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, May.
    2. Pascucci, Domenico & Sassano, Michele & Nurchis, Mario Cesare & Cicconi, Michela & Acampora, Anna & Park, Daejun & Morano, Carmen & Damiani, Gianfranco, 2021. "Impact of interprofessional collaboration on chronic disease management: Findings from a systematic review of clinical trial and meta-analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 191-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:14799-:d:968817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.